Lattice vs PerformYard
Three of fourteen models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; three named PerformYard. Lattice was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PerformYard by thirteen and Lattice carries 32 labels and PerformYard 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.
By framing
LatticeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformYard
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Lattice and PerformYard were named in the same answer 148 times, of the 711 answers naming Lattice and the 229 naming PerformYard. In those answers PerformYard took the first choice ten times and Lattice sixty.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Lattice PerformYard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and PerformYard on the right.The direct prompt
Lattice first, PerformYard an alternative
3 of 14 modelsPerformYard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.PerformYard first, Lattice not the choice
3 of 14 modelsLattice was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PerformYard29%#1 of 13Lattice4%#5 of 13Lattice30%#1 of 12PerformYard13%#2 of 12What the models said about Lattice
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about PerformYard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For the most budget-friendly options, Factorial and PerformYard are especially worth considering due to their lower starting prices and strong user ratings.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with PerformYard or SuccessionNow if you want a dedicated succession planning tool” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“PerformYard or SuccessionNow offer good balance of features, usability, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.