Goals and OKRs · November 2026 Edition
Profit.co vs Teamflect
One of fourteen models named Profit.co first on the direct prompt; zero named Teamflect. Profit.co was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Teamflect by seven and Profit.co carries 44 labels and Teamflect 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share13%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels4411A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Profit.co reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Tability vs Profit.co · Tability vs Teamflect · Profit.co vs Perdoo
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Profit.coFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamflect
Direct101 against Profit.co
Paraphrase201 against Profit.co
Comparative00
Budget-constrained421 against Profit.co
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Profit.co
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Profit.co and Teamflect stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Profit.co Teamflect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Profit.co on the left and Teamflect on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Profit.co and Teamflect stood in it.
Profit.co first, Teamflect not the choice
1 of 14 modelsTeamflect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashProfit.co alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: 15Five, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Muse Glimmer 30BTability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniBetterworks alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Perdoo, WorkBoard
Perplexity SonarCascade Strategy alternatives: Perdoo, Tability
Grok 4.20Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
Mistral SmallTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome
MiniMax M2.5Leapsome, Tability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Profit.co leads by fifteen points.
Profit.co17%#2 of 20Teamflect2%#11 of 20Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
What the models said about Profit.co
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“creation is slow and form-heavy, with no importer... the interface has a steep learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Steer clear of enterprise platforms (like WorkBoard or Profit.co's higher tiers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profit.co bundles goals with performance and strategy execution but can feel more feature-heavy.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“The best free OKR management software in 2026 is Profit.co, which offers a permanently free plan with unlimited OKRs” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Profit.co — *Best Free Option* ... The most generous truly free plan that never expires” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Profit.co (Best Overall Free Option) ... Permanently free plan for unlimited users and OKRs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Teamflect
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“It is widely cited as having the most generous free tier for startups, often allowing up to 10 users for free.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tability vs Profit.coTability vs TeamflectProfit.co vs PerdooProfit.co vs LatticeProfit.co vs LeapsomeProfit.co vs OKRs ToolProfit.co vs MooncampPerdoo vs TeamflectLattice vs TeamflectLeapsome vs TeamflectOKRs Tool vs TeamflectMooncamp vs TeamflectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.