Profit.co vs Mooncamp
One of fourteen models named Profit.co first on the direct prompt; two named Mooncamp. Profit.co was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Mooncamp by eleven and Profit.co carries 44 labels and Mooncamp 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
Profit.coFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMooncamp
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Profit.co and Mooncamp were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 139 answers naming Profit.co and the 70 naming Mooncamp. In those answers Mooncamp took the first choice seven times and Profit.co six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Profit.co Mooncamp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Profit.co on the left and Mooncamp on the right.The direct prompt
Profit.co first, Mooncamp not the choice
1 of 14 modelsMooncamp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mooncamp first, Profit.co an alternative
2 of 14 modelsProfit.co was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Profit.co17%#2 of 20Mooncamp12%#4 of 20What the models said about Profit.co
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“creation is slow and form-heavy, with no importer... the interface has a steep learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Steer clear of enterprise platforms (like WorkBoard or Profit.co's higher tiers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profit.co bundles goals with performance and strategy execution but can feel more feature-heavy.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“The best free OKR management software in 2026 is Profit.co, which offers a permanently free plan with unlimited OKRs” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Profit.co — *Best Free Option* ... The most generous truly free plan that never expires” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Profit.co (Best Overall Free Option) ... Permanently free plan for unlimited users and OKRs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Mooncamp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“five paid seats for Perdoo and Mooncamp, which can make "low" per-user pricing misleading for small teams” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tability or Mooncamp for clean UIs, weekly check-ins, and visual alignment” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Pure OKR Focus: Mooncamp” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Mooncamp (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.