Jostle vs Workvivo
Four of fourteen models named Jostle first on the direct prompt; zero named Workvivo. Jostle was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Workvivo by fourteen and Jostle carries 22 labels and Workvivo 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal communications and intranet page.
By framing
JostleFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkvivo
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Jostle and Workvivo were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 83 answers naming Jostle and the 164 naming Workvivo. In those answers Workvivo took the first choice one time and Jostle eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Jostle Workvivo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jostle on the left and Workvivo on the right.The direct prompt
Jostle first, Workvivo an alternative
4 of 14 modelsWorkvivo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Jostle23%#1 of 18Workvivo0%#18 of 18Workvivo4%#6 of 11Jostle0%#– of 11What the models said about Jostle
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Jostle is praised for its clean interface and minimal setup, making it a strong fit for mid-market B2B firms” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Jostle if you want the best balance of features, ease of use, and transparent pricing” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one, I'd recommend Jostle or ThoughtFarmer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workvivo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Workvivo, Simpplr, or Staffbase” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Simpplr, Workvivo, or Staffbase” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“$20,000+ one-time cost — may be pricey for smaller mid-market companies; more geared toward larger orgs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Safer Alternatives to Consider... Workvivo, Simpplr, Happeo, Staffbase — built with security-first architecture” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Better Alternatives ... Workvivo | 4.8/5 | Social feed, mobile-friendly for frontline, strong engagement” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“Prefer modern, cloud-native options with strong track records: Simpplr, Workvivo, LumApps” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.