Index › HR › Onboarding and employee experience › Internal communications › Microsoft Teams vs Jostle
Internal communications and intranet · November 2026 Edition

Microsoft Teams vs Jostle

Zero of fourteen models named Microsoft Teams first on the direct prompt; four named Jostle. Microsoft Teams was named by ten of the fourteen models and Jostle by eleven and Microsoft Teams carries 14 labels and Jostle 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Teams

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Jostle

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share11%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1422A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Teams reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Simpplr was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Simpplr vs Microsoft Teams · Simpplr vs Jostle · Microsoft SharePoint vs Microsoft Teams

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal communications and intranet page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft TeamsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJostle
Direct04
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained11
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Teams and Jostle stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Microsoft Teams Jostle first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Teams on the left and Jostle on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Teams and Jostle stood in it.

Jostle first, Microsoft Teams not the choice

4 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Teams was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallJostle alternatives: Interact, Microsoft SharePoint, MyHub Intranet, Simpplr, ThoughtFarmer
DeepSeek V4 FlashJostle, ThoughtFarmer alternatives: Microsoft SharePoint
Llama 4 MaverickJostle alternatives: Haiilo, LumApps, Simpplr, Workvivo
Kimi K2Jostle alternatives: Blink, Simpplr

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarThoughtFarmer alternatives: Jostle, Powell Intranet, Workvivo
Grok 4.20Simpplr alternatives: Haiilo, Interact, Jostle, Unily, Workvivo
GLM 4.7 FlashXSimpplr alternatives: Blink, Jostle, ThoughtFarmer

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft SharePoint alternatives: Axero, Connecteam, Workvivo
Gemini 3.5 FlashSimpplr alternatives: Guru, Happeo, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Viva, Notion, Staffbase, Workvivo
Qwen 3.7 FlashSimpplr alternatives: LumApps, MangoApps, Unily, Workvivo
MiniMax M2.5Simpplr alternatives: LumApps, Workvivo
GPT-6 LunaSharePoint in Teams, Simpplr alternatives: Happeo, Staffbase
Muse Glimmer 30BMyHub Intranet, ThoughtFarmer alternatives: Simpplr, Workvivo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Jostle leads by nineteen points.
Jostle23%#1 of 18
Microsoft Teams4%#8 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Microsoft Teams leads at mid-market.
Microsoft Teams11%#3 of 15
Jostle9%#4 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Teams leads by ten points.
Microsoft Teams10%#3 of 11
Jostle0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Teams

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Stick with Google Sites or SharePoint first—you can launch a effective intranet in a few days with zero software outlay.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: Microsoft Teams + SharePoint—if your company already runs on Microsoft 365.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Already using Microsoft 365? → Go with Microsoft Teams (cost-effective, seamless integration)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jostle

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Jostle is praised for its clean interface and minimal setup, making it a strong fit for mid-market B2B firms” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Jostle if you want the best balance of features, ease of use, and transparent pricing” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one, I'd recommend Jostle or ThoughtFarmer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.