Marketing resource management · RankedTeamhood
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
monday.com Work Management is first at 39%.
monday.com Work Management is first at 19%.
Aprimo is first at 29%.
Why models recommend it
“Listed as the "best free marketing resource management software."”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Teamhood offers a free plan with unlimited users, which is practically unheard of in this category”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Visual scheduling at affordable prices; Teamhood even offers a strong free tier”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Teamhood – best free marketing resource management software.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Listed as shut down but still being sold—major red flag”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Teamhood, over the 15 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 10 | 1 | View → | |
| 9 | 6 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 7 | 2 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 2 | View → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Teamhood →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Teamhood and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Teamhood came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 39 | 4 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2023-06-13 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-03 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2022-05-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Clickup alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-01Teamwork alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-01Project online alternative comparison
- 2026-07-036 best wrike alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-117 best trello alternatives comparison
- 2026-05-28Best smartsheet alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teamhood.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.