Index › GTM › Sales › Intent data › ZoomInfo vs Cognism
B2B intent data providers · November 2026 Edition

ZoomInfo vs Cognism

One of fourteen models named ZoomInfo first on the direct prompt; zero named Cognism. ZoomInfo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cognism by nine and ZoomInfo carries 44 labels and Cognism 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ZoomInfo

criticized challenger

Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in fifteen categories this edition.

Cognism

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate27%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4413A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ZoomInfo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Bombora was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Bombora vs ZoomInfo · Bombora vs Cognism · Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZoomInfoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCognism
Direct10
Paraphrase41
Comparative00
Budget-constrained005 against ZoomInfo · 1 against Cognism
Scale-constrained00
Negative017 against ZoomInfo · 1 against Cognism
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ZoomInfo and Cognism were named in the same answer 211 times, of the 617 answers naming ZoomInfo and the 397 naming Cognism. In those answers Cognism took the first choice six times and ZoomInfo forty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ZoomInfo and Cognism stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ZoomInfo Cognism first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ZoomInfo on the left and Cognism on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ZoomInfo and Cognism stood in it.

ZoomInfo first, Cognism an alternative

1 of 14 modelsCognism was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashZoomInfo alternatives: Apollo.io, Bombora, Cognism, G2 Buyer Intent

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarBombora alternatives: Dealfront, G2 Buyer Intent, ZoomInfo
Grok 4.20Apollo.io alternatives: Bombora, Dealfront, Factors.ai, G2 Buyer Intent, ZoomInfo
Muse Glimmer 30BHubSpot Breeze Intelligence alternatives: 6sense, Bombora, Salesmotion, TechTarget Priority Engine, ZoomInfo

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Bombora, G2 Buyer Intent
GPT-5.4 miniBombora alternatives: 6sense, Demandbase
Mistral SmallBombora alternatives: Apollo.io, G2 Buyer Intent, Warmly
DeepSeek V4 FlashAdRoll ABM alternatives: Bombora, G2 Buyer Intent, ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on
Llama 4 MaverickBombora alternatives: 6sense, Apollo.io, G2 Buyer Intent
Qwen 3.7 FlashBombora, Factors.ai alternatives: Apollo.io, Prospeo
Kimi K2G2 Buyer Intent, ZoomInfo Streaming Intent alternatives: Apollo.io, Bombora, Warmly
GLM 4.7 FlashXFactors.ai alternatives: Apollo.io, Dealfront, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
MiniMax M2.5Bombora alternatives: G2 Buyer Intent, Salesmotion, Sona, TrustRadius
GPT-6 LunaBombora alternatives: 6sense, G2 Buyer Intent

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ZoomInfo leads by two points.
ZoomInfo2%#7 of 13
Cognism0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ZoomInfo leads by seven points.
ZoomInfo9%#3 of 12
Cognism2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
ZoomInfo4%#4 of 9
Cognism4%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ZoomInfo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Bidstream-based providers (e.g., ZoomInfo, Demandbase) - Why avoid: These providers harvest intent data from ad auctions, which is legally contested” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Data accuracy issues: Multiple sources cite outdated contacts, incorrect job titles, and stale information as persistent problems” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Cognism

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.