Eight of fourteen models named Bombora first on the direct prompt; one named ZoomInfo. Both were named by all fourteen models and Bombora carries 68 labels and ZoomInfo 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Bombora and ZoomInfo were named in the same answer 164 times, of the 278 answers naming Bombora and the 617 naming ZoomInfo. In those answers ZoomInfo took the first choice twelve times and Bombora forty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Bombora (~$25K+/year) — Enterprise-grade, not budget-friendly” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Nobody should pay for Bombora data twice across four platforms that all resell it” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as 6sense, Demandbase, or Bombora initially” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Key Differentiator: Higher data accuracy and consent compliance than raw ad-tech/bidstream data because it measures actual content consumption on trusted B2B publisher sites.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Bombora if you need a relatively neutral third-party topic-intent feed to integrate into your CRM, CDP, or marketing stack.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you have an established ABM program, jump straight to Bombora or a similar provider to layer on top of your existing workflow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Bidstream-based providers (e.g., ZoomInfo, Demandbase) - Why avoid: These providers harvest intent data from ad auctions, which is legally contested” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Data accuracy issues: Multiple sources cite outdated contacts, incorrect job titles, and stale information as persistent problems” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.