Bombora vs Cognism
Eight of fourteen models named Bombora first on the direct prompt; zero named Cognism. Bombora was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cognism by nine and Bombora carries 68 labels and Cognism 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
BomboraFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCognism
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Bombora and Cognism were named in the same answer sixty-four times, of the 278 answers naming Bombora and the 397 naming Cognism. In those answers Cognism took the first choice four times and Bombora ten.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Bombora Cognism first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Bombora on the left and Cognism on the right.The direct prompt
Bombora first, Cognism not the choice
8 of 14 modelsCognism was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Bombora0%#12 of 13Cognism0%#11 of 13Bombora34%#1 of 12Cognism2%#8 of 12What the models said about Bombora
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Bombora (~$25K+/year) — Enterprise-grade, not budget-friendly” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Nobody should pay for Bombora data twice across four platforms that all resell it” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as 6sense, Demandbase, or Bombora initially” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Key Differentiator: Higher data accuracy and consent compliance than raw ad-tech/bidstream data because it measures actual content consumption on trusted B2B publisher sites.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Bombora if you need a relatively neutral third-party topic-intent feed to integrate into your CRM, CDP, or marketing stack.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you have an established ABM program, jump straight to Bombora or a similar provider to layer on top of your existing workflow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cognism
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.