Sales commissions and incentive compensation · November 2026 Edition
CaptivateIQ vs Performio
Twelve of fourteen models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Performio. Both were named by all fourteen models and CaptivateIQ carries 57 labels and Performio 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share38%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5742A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CaptivateIQ reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Salesforce Spiff was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Everstage · CaptivateIQ vs Sales Cookie · CaptivateIQ vs Visdum
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CaptivateIQFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformio
Direct120
Paraphrase702 against CaptivateIQ · 1 against Performio
Comparative43
Budget-constrained004 against CaptivateIQ · 2 against Performio
Scale-constrained21
Negative005 against CaptivateIQ · 4 against Performio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, CaptivateIQ and Performio were named in the same answer ninety-five times, of the 155 answers naming CaptivateIQ and the 116 naming Performio. In those answers Performio took the first choice seven times and CaptivateIQ twenty-six.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CaptivateIQ and Performio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
CaptivateIQ Performio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CaptivateIQ on the left and Performio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CaptivateIQ and Performio stood in it.
CaptivateIQ first, Performio an alternative
12 of 14 modelsPerformio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
Mistral SmallCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Visdum, Xactly Incent
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
GPT-6 LunaCaptivateIQ alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ alternatives: EasyComp, Everstage, Qobra, Visdum
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.DeepSeek V4 FlashQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
Llama 4 MaverickVisdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Qobra
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CaptivateIQ leads by six points.
CaptivateIQ6%#5 of 12Performio0%#10 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
CaptivateIQ leads by thirty-six points.
CaptivateIQ38%#1 of 13Performio2%#8 of 13Enterprise
CaptivateIQ leads by seventeen points.
CaptivateIQ22%#2 of 10Performio6%#4 of 10What the models said about CaptivateIQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if you expect setup and reporting to be effortless. Review themes include complex setup and friction with reporting” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Consider CaptivateIQ only if you have the resources to support a longer, more complex implementation.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market to enterprise RevOps teams that need a no-code SmartGrid engine that can model virtually any compensation structure” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies with complex comp structures, CaptivateIQ or Everstage would be the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Performio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if near-real-time data is a must-have. G2 material notes complaints about delayed updates and reporting performance” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“weak spots include an interface that feels dated, slow page loads with large datasets, occasional sync delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Highest ease + AI balance, scalable without tech experts | Can be pricier for very simple needs | 4.1/5 (top in many scorings)” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Performio is positioned as the clear leader for the best balance of ease of use and AI capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ vs EverstageCaptivateIQ vs Sales CookieCaptivateIQ vs VisdumCaptivateIQ vs QuotaPathCaptivateIQ vs QobraCaptivateIQ vs QCommissionEverstage vs PerformioSales Cookie vs PerformioVisdum vs PerformioQuotaPath vs PerformioQobra vs PerformioQCommission vs PerformioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full commissions standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.