Sales commissions and incentive compensation · November 2026 Edition
Sales Cookie vs Performio
Zero of fourteen models named Sales Cookie first on the direct prompt; zero named Performio. Sales Cookie was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Performio by fourteen and Sales Cookie carries 15 labels and Performio 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1542A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Sales Cookie reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Sales Cookie · CaptivateIQ vs Performio · Everstage vs Sales Cookie
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Sales CookieFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformio
Direct00
Paraphrase001 against Performio
Comparative03
Budget-constrained702 against Performio
Scale-constrained01
Negative004 against Performio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Sales Cookie and Performio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Sales Cookie Performio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Sales Cookie on the left and Performio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Sales Cookie and Performio stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
DeepSeek V4 FlashQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Visdum, Xactly Incent
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
Mistral SmallCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Llama 4 MaverickVisdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Qobra
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
GPT-6 LunaCaptivateIQ alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ alternatives: EasyComp, Everstage, Qobra, Visdum
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Sales Cookie leads by thirteen points.
Sales Cookie13%#3 of 12Performio0%#10 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Sales Cookie leads by eleven points.
Sales Cookie13%#3 of 13Performio2%#8 of 13Enterprise
The order flips: Performio leads at enterprise.
Performio6%#4 of 10Sales Cookie0%#– of 10What the models said about Sales Cookie
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For most small companies with limited budgets, Sales Cookie is likely your best choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Sales Cookie if you're a startup ... or want the best reputation/value balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Sales Cookie (if you qualify for free) or QuotaPath” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Performio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if near-real-time data is a must-have. G2 material notes complaints about delayed updates and reporting performance” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“weak spots include an interface that feels dated, slow page loads with large datasets, occasional sync delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Highest ease + AI balance, scalable without tech experts | Can be pricier for very simple needs | 4.1/5 (top in many scorings)” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Performio is positioned as the clear leader for the best balance of ease of use and AI capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ vs Sales CookieCaptivateIQ vs PerformioEverstage vs Sales CookieEverstage vs PerformioSales Cookie vs VisdumSales Cookie vs QuotaPathSales Cookie vs QobraSales Cookie vs QCommissionVisdum vs PerformioQuotaPath vs PerformioQobra vs PerformioQCommission vs PerformioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full commissions standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.