Sales commissions and incentive compensation · November 2026 Edition
Visdum vs Performio
One of fourteen models named Visdum first on the direct prompt; zero named Performio. Visdum was named by ten of the fourteen models and Performio by fourteen and Visdum carries 16 labels and Performio 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1642A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Visdum reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CaptivateIQ was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Visdum · CaptivateIQ vs Performio · Everstage vs Visdum
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VisdumFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformio
Direct10
Paraphrase301 against Performio
Comparative03
Budget-constrained102 against Performio
Scale-constrained011 against Visdum
Negative004 against Performio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Visdum and Performio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Visdum Performio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Visdum on the left and Performio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Visdum and Performio stood in it.
Visdum first, Performio not the choice
1 of 14 modelsPerformio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickVisdum alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Qobra
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: Performio, Qobra, Salesforce Spiff
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Perplexity SonarCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Visdum
Grok 4.20CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
DeepSeek V4 FlashQuotaPath alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Performio, Salesforce Spiff
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Performio, Visdum, Xactly Incent
Muse Glimmer 30BCaptivateIQ alternatives: EasyComp, Everstage, Qobra, Visdum
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Kimi K2CaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
GLM 4.7 FlashXCaptivateIQ, Everstage alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Salesforce Spiff, Xactly Incent
GPT-6 LunaCaptivateIQ alternatives: QuotaPath, Salesforce Spiff
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Performio leads at enterprise.
Performio6%#4 of 10Visdum2%#– of 10What the models said about Visdum
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“SMB / Simple | QuotaPath, Visdum | Only if you have <10 comp plans and minimal complexity.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best sales commission management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Visdum” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Best overall on a tight budget: Visdum — strongest fit for small teams” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Visdum Best Overall for Mid-Market Companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Performio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if near-real-time data is a must-have. G2 material notes complaints about delayed updates and reporting performance” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“weak spots include an interface that feels dated, slow page loads with large datasets, occasional sync delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Highest ease + AI balance, scalable without tech experts | Can be pricier for very simple needs | 4.1/5 (top in many scorings)” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Performio is positioned as the clear leader for the best balance of ease of use and AI capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
CaptivateIQ vs VisdumCaptivateIQ vs PerformioEverstage vs VisdumEverstage vs PerformioSales Cookie vs VisdumSales Cookie vs PerformioVisdum vs QuotaPathVisdum vs QobraVisdum vs QCommissionQuotaPath vs PerformioQobra vs PerformioQCommission vs PerformioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full commissions standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.