Twelve of fourteen models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; four named Everstage. Both were named by all fourteen models and CaptivateIQ carries 57 labels and Everstage 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, CaptivateIQ and Everstage were named in the same answer ninety-nine times, of the 155 answers naming CaptivateIQ and the 134 naming Everstage. In those answers Everstage took the first choice four times and CaptivateIQ twenty-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if you expect setup and reporting to be effortless. Review themes include complex setup and friction with reporting” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Consider CaptivateIQ only if you have the resources to support a longer, more complex implementation.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market to enterprise RevOps teams that need a no-code SmartGrid engine that can model virtually any compensation structure” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies with complex comp structures, CaptivateIQ or Everstage would be the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Everstage lacks the advanced functionality needed to manage large scale incentive plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Everstage if you want a no-code, mid-market platform with strong rep dashboards and AI forecasting.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want a user-friendly, fast-to-implement tool with strong rep transparency, choose Everstage.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.