Five of fourteen models named Silktide Governance first on the direct prompt; zero named Deque axe Platform. Silktide Governance was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Deque axe Platform by nine and Silktide Governance carries 48 labels and Deque axe Platform 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the website governance and accessibility page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Silktide Governance and Deque axe Platform were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 117 answers naming Silktide Governance and the 39 naming Deque axe Platform. In those answers Deque axe Platform took the first choice zero times and Silktide Governance six.
| Model | DirectSG | ParaphraseSG | ComparativeSG | Budget-constrainedSG | Scale-constrainedSG | NegativeSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | SG | SG | SG | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SG | SG | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | SG | SG | SG | SG | SG | |
| Perplexity Sonar | SG | SG | SG | SG | SG | |
| Grok 4.20 | SG | SG | SG | |||
| Mistral Small | SG | SG | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SG | SG | SG | SG | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | SG | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SG | |||||
| Kimi K2 | SG | SG | SG | SG | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SG | SG | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | SG | SG | SG | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | SG | SG | SG | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SG | SG | SG |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... Silktide: Premium pricing, though faster ROI” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“can be cost-prohibitive, as they often start at $10,000 to $20,000+ per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“it sits above the sub-$50 tiers above” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Silktide: Known for its "human-first" approach. It combines automated scanning with data on how real users with disabilities experience the site.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“An all-in-one platform for analyzing and improving websites... best for global teams needing a single dashboard for multiple sites and brands.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Siteimprove and Silktide lead the field for teams that want accessibility, content quality and SEO checks in one dashboard.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“or Deque (starting around $5K/year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“The leaders to start with in your evaluation are Level Access, Deque, Siteimprove, and Silktide” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Need stronger developer testing, manual audits, or help running an accessibility program? Look at Deque axe or Level Access.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
“Industry-standard automated tools—such as Deque Axe, Siteimprove, Pope Tech, Level Access, or WAVE” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.