Webinar and virtual event platforms · November 2026 Edition
WebinarJam vs ON24
Zero of fourteen models named WebinarJam first on the direct prompt; zero named ON24. WebinarJam was named by nine of the fourteen models and ON24 by fourteen and WebinarJam carries 17 labels and ON24 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
San Francisco, United States, founded 1998. Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share3%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate35%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1742A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, WebinarJam reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Livestorm was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Livestorm vs WebinarJam · Livestorm vs ON24 · Demio vs WebinarJam
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WebinarJamFirst choices, of fourteen modelsON24
Direct004 against ON24
Paraphrase011 against ON24
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained001 against ON24
Negative005 against WebinarJam
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where WebinarJam and ON24 stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
WebinarJam ON24 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, WebinarJam on the left and ON24 on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where WebinarJam and ON24 stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniLivestorm, RingCentral Events alternatives: ON24, Zoom Webinars
Perplexity SonarLivestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Bizzabo, Goldcast, ON24, Zoom Webinars
Mistral SmallAirmeet, Livestorm alternatives: Goldcast, ON24, Zoom Webinars
GPT-6 LunaGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
Muse Glimmer 30BZoom Webinars alternatives: Airmeet, Goldcast, Livestorm, ON24
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Livestorm alternatives: Demio, Goldcast
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Airmeet, Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
Grok 4.20Livestorm alternatives: Hubilo
DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Airmeet, Demio, Goldcast
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashDemio alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars
Kimi K2Livestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Demio, Goldcast
GLM 4.7 FlashXDemio, Goldcast alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Livestorm
MiniMax M2.5Demio alternatives: Airmeet, EasyWebinar, GoTo Webinar, Zoom Webinars
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
WebinarJam0%#7 of 14ON240%#14 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: ON24 leads at enterprise.
ON2435%#1 of 15WebinarJam0%#15 of 15What the models said about WebinarJam
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid or approach with extreme caution: WebinarJam, Airmeet (due to business ethics), and Events.com.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: High Caution / Avoid if possible.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid EasyWebinar, WebinarJam, Demio” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“ClickMeeting from $25/mo and EasyWebinar Launch from $36/mo billed annually are the strongest value picks right now” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“1. WebinarJam - Best Overall for Budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Automated and evergreen webinars, especially for course creators and small businesses” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
What the models said about ON24
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-grade demand gen platform with quote-only pricing — likely overkill (and overpriced) for most mid-sized teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid ON24 unless you're a larger enterprise” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Higher price point, steeper learning curve, and a legacy interface compared to newer platforms like Goldcast.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, ON24 is the strongest overall recommendation” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Shortlist ON24 instead if marketing attribution, personalization, and always-on content conversion justify a higher-priced enterprise platform.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“ON24 is the better "grow into it" option—but it's typically more of an enterprise purchase and can be overkill for some mid-sized teams” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Livestorm vs WebinarJamLivestorm vs ON24Demio vs WebinarJamDemio vs ON24Zoho Webinar vs WebinarJamZoho Webinar vs ON24Goldcast vs WebinarJamGoldcast vs ON24Zoom Webinars vs WebinarJamZoom Webinars vs ON24Airmeet vs WebinarJamAirmeet vs ON24All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full webinars standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.