Fourteen of fourteen models named Wistia first on the direct prompt; three named Vidyard. Both were named by all fourteen models and Wistia carries 79 labels and Vidyard 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in three categories this edition.
Kitchener, Canada, founded 2011. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Wistia and Vidyard were named in the same answer 165 times, of the 232 answers naming Wistia and the 176 naming Vidyard. In those answers Vidyard took the first choice nine times and Wistia ninety-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Consider Wistia only if video marketing becomes a core part of your strategy and you have budget for it” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“at a fraction of the cost of competitors like Wistia or Vidyard (which often start at $50–$80/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent for marketing analytics and lead capture, but usually too expensive for very tight budgets” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Wistia is the strongest overall choice for marketers because its Business plan pairs video hosting with lead capture forms, CTAs, and analytics built for campaigns” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“For business use, most private platforms are better than YouTube. Wistia, Vimeo, SproutVideo, and Fastio all provide ad-free hosting with stronger privacy options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Host on your website (via paid platforms like Wistia, Brightcove, or Vidyard for marketing-specific features like CTAs, heatmaps, and integrations)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Six of the best-known business video hosts store your files in the United States by default.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“competitors like Wistia or Vidyard (which often start at $50–$80/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“useful for sales/marketing teams, but also tends to be pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Consider platforms like Wistia, Vidyard, or Brightcove for advanced analytics, lead generation, and branding control.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Vidyard is known for its video hosting and marketing platforms that allow for embedding, player controls, and collections” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Pick #1: Vidyard (Best for B2B Sales & Account-Based Marketing)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.