Two of fourteen models named YouTube Ads first on the direct prompt; zero named TikTok Ads. Both were named by all fourteen models and YouTube Ads carries 51 labels and TikTok Ads 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By YouTube, San Bruno, United States, founded 2005. Named in two categories this edition.
By TikTok, Ireland, founded 2016. Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, YouTube Ads and TikTok Ads were named in the same answer eighty-eight times, of the 135 answers naming YouTube Ads and the 156 naming TikTok Ads. In those answers TikTok Ads took the first choice eleven times and YouTube Ads twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“YouTube Ads and Meta Ads are also mentioned as having some negative labels, but not to the same extent as X” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“especially where the money is juiciest: Connected TV (CTV), YouTube, in-stream and in-feed video” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“its open inventory—particularly user-generated content—can pose significant brand safety risks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for intent and evergreen / low CPV: YouTube TrueView or YouTube Shorts. The CPV model and $2-$6 CPM for Shorts make it the most cost-efficient for small budgets.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose YouTube if you want to capture users with specific intent, need detailed analytics, or want to leverage Google's ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“YouTube and Facebook/Instagram are generally the safest starting points due to their flexibility and targeting options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Many enterprise buyers tend to avoid or heavily restrict TikTok for sensitive brand categories due to concerns about brand safety” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“TikTok Ads has emerged as one of the most budget-friendly options, with some sources suggesting daily budgets as low as $20-30 can work for testing.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“TikTok is often the best video advertising platform for companies with limited budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best video advertising platform for a company with a limited budget is TikTok.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.