Ten of fourteen models named Sprout Social first on the direct prompt; zero named Buffer. Both were named by all fourteen models and Sprout Social carries 63 labels and Buffer 52, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Chicago, United States, founded 2010. Named in eleven categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the social media management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Sprout Social and Buffer were named in the same answer 122 times, of the 292 answers naming Sprout Social and the 235 naming Buffer. In those answers Buffer took the first choice thirty-eight times and Sprout Social twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Note on "Avoid": Platforms like Hootsuite and Sprout Social, while powerful, typically start at $99–$149/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Generally too expensive for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Strong for teams; excels in analytics, inbox, reporting, and customer care. Good for mid-sized with collaboration features. Starts ~$249/month; scales well.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best-in-class reporting and engagement features, but per-seat cost adds up. If you have 15–25 social users, this is a strong choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Mid-market to Enterprise (All-in-one) | Exceptional UI, strong team workflows, robust reporting, top-tier customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Has received negative reviews regarding security and billing practices, including unauthorized charges after account cancellation.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid or be cautious about: Buffer (due to its 2013 breach history and Meta account issues)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently grouped with Hootsuite in safety discussions... poor reviews on platforms like Trustpilot for Buffer, Hootsuite, and Metricool” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Buffer – Best for small budgets, offering a free plan for up to 3 social media profiles and paid plans starting at just $6 per month per channel.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small to medium-sized businesses, Buffer, Agorapulse, or SocialPilot tend to have more consistent user satisfaction records” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Start with Industry Leaders: Platforms like Buffer, Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Later, and Meta Business Suite have established reputations” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.