Index › GTM › Marketing › Reviews › Birdeye vs Reputation
Review and reputation management · November 2026 Edition

Birdeye vs Reputation

Two of fourteen models named Birdeye first on the direct prompt; one named Reputation. Birdeye was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Reputation by thirteen and Birdeye carries 51 labels and Reputation 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Birdeye

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Reputation

accepted challenger

By Reputation.com, Redwood City, United States, founded 2006. Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share19%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%24%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5133A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Birdeye reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Reviewflowz was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Birdeye vs Reviewflowz · Birdeye vs Brand24 · Birdeye vs Trustpilot

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the review and reputation management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BirdeyeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsReputation
Direct211 against Reputation
Paraphrase611 against Birdeye · 1 against Reputation
Comparative711 against Reputation
Budget-constrained003 against Birdeye · 2 against Reputation
Scale-constrained201 against Birdeye
Negative202 against Birdeye · 3 against Reputation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Birdeye and Reputation were named in the same answer 123 times, of the 380 answers naming Birdeye and the 138 naming Reputation. In those answers Reputation took the first choice fourteen times and Birdeye thirty-six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Birdeye and Reputation stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Birdeye Reputation first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Birdeye on the left and Reputation on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Birdeye and Reputation stood in it.

Birdeye first, Reputation an alternative

2 of 14 modelsReputation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniBirdeye alternatives: G2 Buyer Intent, Reputation, ReviewTrackers
Kimi K2Birdeye alternatives: G2 Marketing Solutions, Reviewflowz

Reputation first, Birdeye an alternative

1 of 14 modelsBirdeye was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXReputation alternatives: Birdeye, Feefo, ReputationStacker

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarReviewflowz alternatives: Birdeye
Grok 4.20Trustpilot alternatives: Birdeye, Reviewflowz
Mistral SmallReviewflowz, Trustpilot alternatives: Birdeye
DeepSeek V4 FlashG2 Marketing Solutions alternatives: Birdeye, Gartner Peer Insights, Reviewflowz, TrustRadius
Qwen 3.7 FlashTrustpilot alternatives: Birdeye, Influitive, ReviewInc, UserEvidence
MiniMax M2.5G2 Buyer Intent, Trustpilot alternatives: Birdeye, Reputation, Reviewflowz
Muse Glimmer 30BTrustpilot alternatives: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Reviewflowz

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Reviewflowz alternatives: TrustRadius
Gemini 3.5 FlashG2 Buyer Intent alternatives: Base, Clutch, Influitive, ReviewTrackers, Reviewflowz, Trustpilot, UserEvidence
Llama 4 MaverickReviewflowz alternatives: Podium, Trustpilot
GPT-6 LunaReviewflowz alternatives: G2 Marketing Solutions

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Birdeye leads by twenty-one points.
Birdeye21%#2 of 15
Reputation0%#15 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Birdeye leads by fifteen points.
Birdeye19%#1 of 12
Reputation4%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Birdeye leads by four points.
Birdeye29%#1 of 8
Reputation25%#2 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Birdeye

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Other Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Birdeye and Podium: ... pricing is custom/quote-based and typically higher” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Birdeye: Strong all-in-one for review generation, management, and analytics. Excellent for multi-location; AI features and high user ratings (~4.7/5 on Capterra). Good for scaling teams.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Birdeye is described as an AI review and reputation platform with listings and messaging... positioned as best for multi-location enterprise with a unified CX suite” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Birdeye if: You manage 10+ locations and need an all-in-one solution with listings, messaging, and AI features.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Reputation

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Frequent complaints about false promises, skewed algorithms ... Trustpilot scores around 3.3/5 with many calling it a "scam"” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-focused tools like Yotpo, Reputation.com, or Grade.us can exceed $100\u2013500+/month quickly.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“dominate advertising, they typically cost $250 to $500+ per month with locked-in annual contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If your priority is B2B-specific monitoring, social listening and turning feedback into operational insight, Reputation.com is the most explicitly B2B-tuned option.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Birdeye or Reputation.com if you're an enterprise managing hundreds of locations” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Reputation.com is the safest, most robust choice for mid-market B2B” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.