Two of fourteen models named Brand24 first on the direct prompt; zero named CisionOne. Brand24 was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and CisionOne by fourteen and Brand24 carries 45 labels and CisionOne 67, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Wrocław, Poland, founded 2011. Named in seven categories this edition.
By Cision, Chicago, United States, founded 1867. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the PR and media monitoring page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Brand24 and CisionOne were named in the same answer 108 times, of the 232 answers naming Brand24 and the 195 naming CisionOne. In those answers CisionOne took the first choice eight times and Brand24 forty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“pricing and features less competitive compared to alternatives” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“reported limitations around mobile alerts and traditional-media coverage may matter for high-risk brands” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Brand24 stands out as the best overall PR and media monitoring platform for companies with limited budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“the sweet spot is Brand24 (≈ $79 / month) for the best overall balance of coverage, speed, and price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“The best PR and media monitoring platform for a company with a limited budget is Brand24.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Cision/CisionOne is the clearest "proceed carefully" name: G2 reviewers report data inaccuracy, irrelevant results, and missed coverage” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-level contracts, high cost, not recommended unless you have a dedicated PR team and a substantial budget.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users experience significant data inaccuracy, as searches often yield irrelevant articles and missed coverage.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cision - Comprehensive platform offering media database, press release distribution, and monitoring... Strong for B2B with extensive journalist contact information.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For an all-in-one PR department: Choose CisionOne if journalist databases, pitching, press-release distribution, and monitoring must live together.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cision | Largest journalist database, PR Newswire distribution, enterprise features | Higher cost, complex interface” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.