Index › GTM › Marketing › Landing pages › Carrd vs Landingi
Landing pages and interactive content · November 2026 Edition

Carrd vs Landingi

Zero of fourteen models named Carrd first on the direct prompt; zero named Landingi. Carrd was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Landingi by nine and Carrd carries 36 labels and Landingi 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Carrd

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Landingi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%1%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3624A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Carrd reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unbounce was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Unbounce vs Carrd · Unbounce vs Landingi · Carrd vs HubSpot Landing Pages

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CarrdFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLandingi
Direct002 against Carrd
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained81
Scale-constrained001 against Carrd
Negative103 against Carrd · 2 against Landingi
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Carrd and Landingi were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 86 answers naming Carrd and the 86 naming Landingi. In those answers Landingi took the first choice two times and Carrd ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Carrd and Landingi stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Carrd Landingi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Carrd on the left and Landingi on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Carrd and Landingi stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Landingi
Llama 4 MaverickUnbounce alternatives: EngageBay, Framer, Instapage, Keap, Landingi, Leadpages, Swipe Pages, Webflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXHubSpot Marketing, Unbounce alternatives: ActiveCampaign, Instapage, Landingi

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage
Gemini 3.5 FlashInstapage alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce, Webflow
Perplexity SonarUnbounce alternatives: Instapage, Mutiny, Personyze, Webflow
Grok 4.20Unbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages
Mistral SmallInstapage, Unbounce alternatives: ConvertFlow, Zoho LandingPage
DeepSeek V4 FlashUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Instapage, Leadpages
Qwen 3.7 FlashUnbounce alternatives: Elementor, HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, WordPress
Kimi K2Unbounce alternatives: Mutiny, Webflow
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: WordPress with Elementor or Thrive Architect
GPT-6 LunaHubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Webflow
Muse Glimmer 30BUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Carrd leads by fourteen points.
Carrd17%#2 of 12
Landingi3%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Carrd leads by ten points.
Carrd12%#2 of 11
Landingi1%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Landingi leads at enterprise.
Landingi7%#4 of 10
Carrd0%#9 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Carrd

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“avoid for serious conversion optimization: it is excellent for inexpensive, simple pages, but it does not provide A/B testing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for mid-market B2B: Pure SMB tools like Carrd or basic WordPress builders (too limited)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“older versions of Instapage or Carrd alternatives): Watch for hidden visitor limits, slow load times” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you're on a very tight budget and only need 1–3 simple pages: Go with Carrd Pro (~$19/year) or the free Carrd plan.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Safer Alternatives to Consider | Carrd | Free / $9/year | Simple, fast, genuinely affordable” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Carrd is consistently called out as the best free/simple option... "Best free option: Carrd"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Landingi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“avoid for only a few occasional pages; its strengths are high-volume publishing and agency workflows, which can add unnecessary cost and complexity” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Landingi's page builder can have rather slow load times” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Landingi Lite ~$29/mo is the most cited best-value paid builder” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Landingi offers an AI composer, SEO generator, and A/B testing for agencies and high‑volume campaigns at a lower price point.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
“Best if you need multiple campaigns, forms, integrations, reusable sections, and more advanced marketing features.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.