Landing pages and interactive content · November 2026 Edition
Carrd vs Leadpages
Zero of fourteen models named Carrd first on the direct prompt; zero named Leadpages. Both were named by all fourteen models and Carrd carries 36 labels and Leadpages 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3645A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Carrd reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unbounce was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Unbounce vs Carrd · Unbounce vs Leadpages · Carrd vs HubSpot Landing Pages
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CarrdFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLeadpages
Direct002 against Carrd · 2 against Leadpages
Paraphrase001 against Leadpages
Comparative03
Budget-constrained831 against Leadpages
Scale-constrained001 against Carrd
Negative103 against Carrd · 8 against Leadpages
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Carrd and Leadpages were named in the same answer seventy-four times, of the 86 answers naming Carrd and the 135 naming Leadpages. In those answers Leadpages took the first choice eighteen times and Carrd fifteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Carrd and Leadpages stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Carrd Leadpages first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Carrd on the left and Leadpages on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Carrd and Leadpages stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.DeepSeek V4 FlashUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Instapage, Leadpages
Llama 4 MaverickUnbounce alternatives: EngageBay, Framer, Instapage, Keap, Landingi, Leadpages, Swipe Pages, Webflow
Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Landingi
GPT-5.4 miniUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage
Gemini 3.5 FlashInstapage alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce, Webflow
Perplexity SonarUnbounce alternatives: Instapage, Mutiny, Personyze, Webflow
Grok 4.20Unbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages
Mistral SmallInstapage, Unbounce alternatives: ConvertFlow, Zoho LandingPage
Qwen 3.7 FlashUnbounce alternatives: Elementor, HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, WordPress
Kimi K2Unbounce alternatives: Mutiny, Webflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXHubSpot Marketing, Unbounce alternatives: ActiveCampaign, Instapage, Landingi
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: WordPress with Elementor or Thrive Architect
GPT-6 LunaHubSpot Landing Pages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Webflow
Muse Glimmer 30BUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Leadpages leads by nine points.
Leadpages26%#1 of 12Carrd17%#2 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Carrd leads at mid-market.
Carrd12%#2 of 11Leadpages4%#5 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Carrd0%#9 of 10Leadpages0%#10 of 10What the models said about Carrd
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“avoid for serious conversion optimization: it is excellent for inexpensive, simple pages, but it does not provide A/B testing” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for mid-market B2B: Pure SMB tools like Carrd or basic WordPress builders (too limited)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“older versions of Instapage or Carrd alternatives): Watch for hidden visitor limits, slow load times” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you're on a very tight budget and only need 1–3 simple pages: Go with Carrd Pro (~$19/year) or the free Carrd plan.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Safer Alternatives to Consider | Carrd | Free / $9/year | Simple, fast, genuinely affordable” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Carrd is consistently called out as the best free/simple option... "Best free option: Carrd"” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Leadpages
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Multiple reviews call it a "scam" for trial/billing issues. Trustpilot around 1.9/5.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Aggressive auto-renewal pricing and a strict no-refund policy are commonly flagged.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Leadpages and PageFly are the two you should actively avoid right now” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Choose Leadpages if you are a freelancer, realtor, or small business owner who just wants an affordable way to collect emails.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most companies on a tight budget, I'd recommend Leadpages if you can afford ~$37/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“My practical pick: _Leadpages_ if you need serious landing pages and conversion tools on a budget.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Unbounce vs CarrdUnbounce vs LeadpagesCarrd vs HubSpot Landing PagesCarrd vs InstapageCarrd vs WebflowCarrd vs LandingiCarrd vs Swipe PagesHubSpot Landing Pages vs LeadpagesInstapage vs LeadpagesLeadpages vs WebflowLeadpages vs LandingiLeadpages vs Swipe PagesAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full landing pages standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.