ActiveCampaign vs Sender
Gane, the publisher, sells software in this category. Every product here is measured by the same method as in every other category. How the conflict is handled.
Four of fourteen models named ActiveCampaign first on the direct prompt; zero named Sender. ActiveCampaign was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sender by eleven and ActiveCampaign carries 53 labels and Sender 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Chicago, United States, founded 2003. Named in sixteen categories this edition.
Vilnius, Lithuania, founded 2012. Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email marketing platforms page.
By framing
ActiveCampaignFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSender
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
ActiveCampaign Sender first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ActiveCampaign on the left and Sender on the right.The direct prompt
ActiveCampaign first, Sender not the choice
4 of 14 modelsSender was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ActiveCampaign37%#1 of 13Sender0%#9 of 13ActiveCampaign26%#2 of 15Sender2%#6 of 15ActiveCampaign4%#4 of 14Sender0%#– of 14What the models said about ActiveCampaign
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Overwhelming for beginners, complex features, not the cheapest, unfair billing policy regarding contact counting” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“ActiveCampaign has a steeper learning curve... it may be more expensive and complicated than necessary” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with HubSpot or ActiveCampaign if your B2B focus is on lead nurturing, sales alignment, and data-driven campaigns” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“or ActiveCampaign if you prioritize automation depth and budget efficiency. Both are industry standards” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“ActiveCampaign is the top recommendation due to its advanced automation and CRM capabilities” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Sender
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Sender.net is unquestionably one of the poorest platforms we've encountered.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.