Six of fourteen models named Zendesk Support Suite first on the direct prompt; one named Intercom. Both were named by all fourteen models and Zendesk Support Suite carries 73 labels and Intercom 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Zendesk, San Francisco, United States, founded 2007. Named in one category this edition.
United States, founded 2011. Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer support and helpdesk page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zendesk Support Suite and Intercom were named in the same answer 126 times, of the 215 answers naming Zendesk Support Suite and the 462 naming Intercom. In those answers Intercom took the first choice three times and Zendesk Support Suite fifty-two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Zendesk instances have been repeatedly implicated in large third-party breaches... "We had the most horrendous support experience with Zendesk."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some specific platforms to avoid or be cautious about include Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud, and SolarWinds for small teams” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Zendesk initially as it's better for mid-sized teams and lacks a strong free option.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Zendesk: Excellent for omnichannel, AI (via Zendesk AI), and analytics. Strong for customer-facing support. Scales well but can get pricey with add-ons. Good for 500+ users.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for: Complex workflows, enterprise routing, SLA-heavy operations - Strengths: Industry standard, extensive integrations, strong security” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Zendesk remains the industry standard for established enterprises with complex needs. It is widely considered the most mature and scalable platform.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid if budget is ultra-tight: Enterprise tools like Zendesk or Intercom, which scale expensively.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.