Index › GTM › Customer › Customer success › Vitally vs Totango
Customer success platforms · November 2026 Edition

Vitally vs Totango

Two of fourteen models named Vitally first on the direct prompt; zero named Totango. Both were named by all fourteen models and Vitally carries 65 labels and Totango 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vitally

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Totango

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share11%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6551A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vitally reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChurnZero was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. ChurnZero vs Vitally · ChurnZero vs Totango · Vitally vs HubSpot Service Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VitallyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTotango
Direct20
Paraphrase10
Comparative01
Budget-constrained011 against Vitally
Scale-constrained301 against Totango
Negative002 against Vitally · 9 against Totango
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Vitally and Totango were named in the same answer ninety-seven times, of the 178 answers naming Vitally and the 176 naming Totango. In those answers Totango took the first choice four times and Vitally ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vitally and Totango stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Vitally Totango first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vitally on the left and Totango on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vitally and Totango stood in it.

Vitally first, Totango an alternative

2 of 14 modelsTotango was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashVitally alternatives: ChurnZero, Planhat, Totango
GPT-6 LunaVitally alternatives: ChurnZero, Planhat

Neither was the first choice, one was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniChurnZero, Gainsight Customer Success alternatives: HubSpot Customer Success Workspace, Totango, Vitally
Gemini 3.5 FlashChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Planhat, Totango, Vitally
Perplexity SonarChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Vitally
Grok 4.20ChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Vitally
Mistral SmallChurnZero alternatives: HubSpot Service Hub, Planhat, Vitally
DeepSeek V4 FlashChurnZero, ClientSuccess alternatives: Planhat, Vitally
Llama 4 MaverickChurnZero alternatives: Custify, Vitally
Kimi K2ChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Vitally
GLM 4.7 FlashXChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Skalin, Totango, Vitally
MiniMax M2.5ChurnZero, Planhat alternatives: Catalyst, Skalin, Totango, Vitally
Muse Glimmer 30BChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Planhat, Vitally

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Vitally leads by twenty-two points.
Vitally24%#2 of 10
Totango2%#8 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Vitally leads by nine points.
Vitally11%#2 of 9
Totango2%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Totango leads at enterprise.
Totango10%#2 of 9
Vitally2%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vitally

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Praised for Notion-like design but has negative reviews on functionality, understaffed support, slow feature delivery, and uneven post-sale attention” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“While Vitally generally has higher user satisfaction ratings than Gainsight, it has specific friction points that can lead to team burnout.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“It's polished for SMBs but may stretch a very tight budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“AI-powered, unified views, and automation. Excellent for mid-market teams wanting a clean CSM workspace without heavy Ops overhead.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Many experts suggest that under ~1,000 customers, Vitally or Custify are often the right fit.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-market companies looking for a balance of power and ease of use.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Totango

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid Totango if your team prioritizes ease of use and daily friction reduction over deep customization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Approach with caution—particularly problematic if you need reliable health scoring or fast support.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Totango has broad features in theory but consistent complaints about UX speed, bugs and slow support make it a risk” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Gainsight and Totango lead with depth, compliance, and flexibility.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Free / Freemium Option: Totango (Starter Plan)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.