Invoicing software for enterprise buyers
Asked as “invoicing software”, and as “online invoicing tool for a business”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · HighRadius 11%
18NetSuite SuiteBilling11HighRadius09Zuora Billing62others
18% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.NetSuite SuiteBilling held the lead, +2 points on 20%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Zoho Invoice30%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 31% → 29%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Invoice24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Zoho Invoice (26%) replaces Wave (19% then, 12% now), 14 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
NetSuite SuiteBilling18%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Zoho Invoice30%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 31% → 29%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Invoice24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Zoho Invoice (26%) replaces Wave (19% then, 12% now), 14 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseNetSuite SuiteBilling18%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01NetSuite SuiteBilling18%6%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 22%
NetSuite SuiteBilling18%6%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 22%02
HighRadius11%0%28accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 8%
HighRadius11%0%28accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 8%03
Zuora Billing9%0%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 8%
Zuora Billing9%0%21accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 8%04
SAP Ariba7%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 5%
SAP Ariba7%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 5%05
SAP Concur7%7%14accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%
SAP Concur7%7%14accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%06
Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%0%10accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%0%10accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%07
Xero4%71%21criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
Xero4%71%21criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%08
Coupa2%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Coupa2%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%09
Tipalti2%6%18accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 15% → 3%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 3%
Tipalti2%6%18accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 15% → 3%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 3%10
Sage Intacct2%0%14accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%
Sage Intacct2%0%14accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 3%11
BILL2%40%30criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 3%
BILL2%40%30criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 3%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Zoho Invoice0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Zoho Invoice0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Wave0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Wave0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%17
QuickBooks0%90%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
QuickBooks0%90%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%16
FreshBooks0%88%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
FreshBooks0%88%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Basware0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Basware0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Chargebee0%0%14accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 0%
Chargebee0%0%14accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Zoho Invoice vs InvoicedZoho Invoice vs NetSuite SuiteBillingZoho Invoice vs XeroBILL vs QuickBooksBILL vs WaveBILL vs InvoicedBILL vs NetSuite SuiteBillingBILL vs XeroQuickBooks vs WaveQuickBooks vs InvoicedQuickBooks vs NetSuite SuiteBillingQuickBooks vs XeroWave vs InvoicedWave vs NetSuite SuiteBillingWave vs XeroInvoiced vs NetSuite SuiteBillingInvoiced vs XeroNetSuite SuiteBilling vs Xero
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314151617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01NetSuite SuiteBilling18%
NetSuite SuiteBilling18%02HighRadius11%
HighRadius11%03Zuora Billing9%
Zuora Billing9%04SAP Ariba7%
SAP Ariba7%05SAP Concur7%
SAP Concur7%06Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%07Xero4%
Xero4%08Coupa2%
Coupa2%09Tipalti2%
Tipalti2%10Sage Intacct2%
Sage Intacct2%11BILL2%
BILL2%12Chargebee0%
Chargebee0%13Basware0%
Basware0%14Wave0%
Wave0%15Zoho Invoice0%
Zoho Invoice0%16FreshBooks0%
FreshBooks0%17QuickBooks0%
QuickBooks0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
FreshBooks88%
15 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“you cannot use standard SaaS invoicing tools (like QuickBooks Online or FreshBooks) because they typically cap user seats at 25 or 50” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Xero71%
15 of 21 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid the following invoicing tools... Xero - Often criticized for being rigid and not ideal for complex invoice and billing workflows” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Wave91%
10 of 11 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Wave has limitations in scalability, advanced reporting, and forecasting functionality, making it unsuitable for large enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
QuickBooks90%
18 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“you cannot use standard SaaS invoicing tools (like QuickBooks Online or FreshBooks) because they typically cap user seats at 25 or 50” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1182 links across 317 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · HighRadius32 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · BILL25 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · BigTime23 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sourceforge16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best invoicing software”, “invoicing software”, “invoicing tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetSuite parent site NetSuite SuiteBilling 18% | 18% | 47 | 135,000 | 4,476 | ||||
| SAP sap.com SAP Ariba 7%, SAP Concur 7%, SAP 2% | 16% | 553 | 135,000 | 74,309 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | |
| HighRadius highradius.com | 11% | 604 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | |
| Zuora Billing zuora.com | 9% | 17 | 24,950 | 6 | ||||
| Salesforce salesforce.com Salesforce Revenue Cloud 4% | 4% | 44 | 550,000 | 60,632 | 7,941,323 company | $8,259 | 115 | |
| Flexprice flexprice.io | 4% | 1 | ||||||
| Tradeshift tradeshift.com | 4% | 38 | 1,300 | 9 | 2,240 | |||
| Xero xero.com | 4% | 729 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 | $500 | 119 | 9 |
| Coupa coupa.com | 2% | 637 | 60,500 | 1,210 | 41,319 | $339 | 91 | |
| Tipalti tipalti.com | 2% | 490 | 18,100 | 381 | 213,652 | $83,363 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, techrepublic.com, thecfoclub.com). The first result for “best invoicing software” is zoho.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best invoicing software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which online invoicing tool for a business would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade invoicing tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best invoicing software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an invoicing software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which invoicing tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5NetSuite SuiteBilling, Sage Intacctno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Financeno first choiceagainst: Basware, Coupa, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Wave, Xero
Five alternatives
BILL, Billtrust, Chargebee, HighRadius, Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceTwo alternatives
NetSuite SuiteBilling, Sage IntacctGPT-5.4 miniSAP Aribaagainst: BILLSAP AribaHeldagainst: BILLSAP AribaIntuit Enterprise Suiteagainst: BILLno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP Financial ManagementThree alternatives
BILL, Coupa, NetSuite SuiteBillingGemini 3.5 FlashSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudHeldagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooks, WaveBillingPlatform, Zuora BillingFlexpriceagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooks, Sageno first choiceagainst: Braintree, FreshBooks, Invoice2go, QuickBooks, Recurly, Stripe Billing, Wave, Xero, Zoho Invoice
Five alternatives
Billtrust, Chargebee, HighRadius, ZoneBilling, Zuora BillingFour alternatives
HighRadius, SEEBURGER E-Invoicing Hub, ZoneBilling, Zuora BillingFive alternatives
Chargebee, Maxio, Metronome, Orb, Stripe BillingFive alternatives
Invoice Ninja, Stripe Billing, TimelyBill, ZoneBilling, Zuora BillingPerplexity SonarTradeshiftSAPChangedagainst: PayPal Invoicing, QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho InvoiceNetSuite SuiteBillingTipaltiagainst: BILL, BigTimeno first choiceagainst: Harvest, HubSpot, Square Invoices, Zoho Invoice
Four alternatives
AvidXchange, Billtrust, Invoiced, SAPTwo alternatives
Coupa, HighRadiusFive alternatives
BILL, HighRadius, Medius, SAP S/4HANA, TipaltiGrok 4.20Zuora Billingagainst: BILLNetSuite SuiteBillingChangedagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, QuickBooks, SAP, Xero, Zoho Invoiceno first choiceNetSuite SuiteBillingagainst: BILL, FreshBooks, QuickBooks, Tipalti, XeroBILLagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooks, Square Invoices, Wave, Xero, Zoho Invoice
Four alternatives
BillingPlatform, Billtrust, HighRadius, SAP Billing / SAP S/4HANA CloudThree alternatives
BILL, Sage Intacct, TipaltiTwo alternatives
Acumatica, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
HighRadius, TraildMistral SmallNetSuite SuiteBilling, Zuora BillingInvoicedChangedagainst: Square Invoices, Zoho Invoiceno first choiceChargezoom, Flexpriceagainst: BILL, BigTime, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Stripe Billingno first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, Sage, Square Invoices, Xero, Zoho Invoice
Two alternatives
Invoiced, Quadient ARDeepSeek V4 FlashHighRadiusSAP Concur InvoiceChangedagainst: QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho InvoiceNetSuite SuiteBillingagainst: BILLSAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Crater, FreshBooks, Invoice Ninja, Invoice Simple, QuickBooks, Square Invoices, Wave, Xero, Zoho Invoice
Four alternatives
Basware, Billtrust, Oracle, SAPFour alternatives
Chargebee, HighRadius, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Zuora BillingFive alternatives
SAP Ariba, SAP Concur, Sage Intacct, Tipalti, Zuora BillingThree alternatives
Coupa, HighRadius, TipaltiLlama 4 MaverickTradeshiftno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks, SAP Concur
Two alternatives
Chargebee, Zuora BillingThree alternatives
BigTime, EBizCharge, NetSuite SuiteBillingQwen 3.7 FlashHighRadiusOracle NetSuite FinancialsChangedagainst: BILL, PayPal Invoicing, Zoho InvoiceNetSuite SuiteBilling, SAP S/4HANA / SAP BRIMInvoice Ninjaagainst: FreshBooks, Invoice Home, Invoicely, QuickBooks, Xerono first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, Invoice Ninja’s free tier, Microsoft Access, Microsoft Excel, QuickBooks, Wave, Xero
Three alternatives
Invoiced, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Zuora RevOpsFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA Business Suite, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Workday Financial ManagementFive alternatives
Chargebee, Recurly, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Stripe Billing, Zuora BillingThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite SuiteBilling, OdooKimi K2NetSuite SuiteBillingNetSuite SuiteBillingHeldNetSuite SuiteBillingNetSuite SuiteBillingagainst: BILL, Xerono first choiceagainst: Airbase, FreshBooks, Square Invoices, Wave, Xero
Five alternatives
Chargebee, SAP Concur, SAP S/4HANA, Stripe Billing, Zuora BillingThree alternatives
HighRadius, Tipalti, Zuora BillingFive alternatives
BILL, Coupa, SAP Billing and Revenue Innovation Management, Sage Intacct, TipaltiThree alternatives
Basware, Coupa, SAP AribaGLM 4.7 FlashXHighRadiusSAP ConcurChangedNetSuite SuiteBilling, Sage IntacctXeroagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooksno first choiceagainst: Clover Invoices, FreshBooks, QuickBooks, Sage, Square Invoices, Wave, Xero, Zoho Invoice
Six alternatives
BILL Accounts Receivable, Chargebee, Maxio, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Sage Intacct, Salesforce Revenue CloudOne alternative
XeroEight alternatives
Airwallex, BILL, FreshBooks, Odoo Accounting, QuickBooks, Tipalti, Xero, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
BILL, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Sage IntacctMiniMax M2.5Zuora BillingNetSuite SuiteBilling, SAP ConcurChangedno first choiceXerono first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, Square Invoices, Wave, Zoho Invoice
Four alternatives
BILL, Invoicera, Sage Intacct, Salesforce CPQThree alternatives
Coupa, HighRadius, Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceSeven alternatives
Chargebee, Coupa, Medius, NetSuite SuiteBilling, SAP Ariba, SAP S/4HANA, Stripe BillingGPT-6 LunaZuora BillingBilltrustChangedno first choiceMediusno first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online's standard tiers, Stripe Invoicing, Wave
Five alternatives
Chargebee, Dynamics 365 Finance Accounts receivable, Maxio, Oracle Fusion Receivables, SAP BRIMThree alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle, SAPFour alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, HighRadius, Zuora BillingMuse Glimmer 30BHighRadiusCoupa, SAP AribaChangedagainst: QuickBooks, ZohoMediusHighRadius, Invoiceraagainst: BILL, FreshBooks, QuickBooksno first choiceagainst: BILL, Pleo, QuickBooks, Xero
Five alternatives
Basware, Coupa, Invoiced, NetSuite SuiteBilling, SAP S/4HANAThree alternatives
Basware, NetSuite SuiteBilling, Zuora BillingSeven alternatives
AvidXchange, Coupa, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, NetSuite SuiteBilling, SAP Concur, Stampli, TipaltiFour alternatives
Invoiced, Quadient AR, Stripe Invoicing, VersapayBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 15 | 67 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 6 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:13 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 20 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 9 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 20 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 15 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 25 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 23 | 104 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 2 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 21 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:51 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:03 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL AP/AR read as BILL
BILL AP/AR (formerly Bill.com) read as BILL
Bill.com read as BILL
Bill.com (BILL) read as BILL
NetSuite read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
NetSuite (Oracle NetSuite) read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
NetSuite (with SuiteBilling) read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
Oracle ERP Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle NetSuite read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
Oracle NetSuite (SuiteBilling) read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
Oracle NetSuite OneWorld read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks
QuickBooks Online (QBO) read as QuickBooks
SAP Cloud ERP read as SAP S/4HANA
Salesforce Billing read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce Billing (CPQ + Billing) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Square read as Square Invoices
Zuora read as Zuora Billing
Unresolved, counted raw
Clover Invoices
Dynamics 365 Finance Accounts receivable
Harvest Invoicing
Invoice Ninja’s free tier
Microsoft Access
NetSuite, including SuiteBilling
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP Financial Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Receivables
Oracle Fusion Receivables
Oracle NetSuite Billing/Revenue Management
Oracle NetSuite Financials (with SuiteBilling)
QuickBooks Online's standard tiers
SAP BRIM
SAP Billing / SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Subscription Billing)
SAP Billing and Revenue Innovation Management (BRIM)
SAP S/4HANA / SAP BRIM
SAP S/4HANA Business Suite
SEEBURGER E-Invoicing Hub
TimelyBill
Zoho Billing Enterprise Edition
Zuora RevOps
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.