Four of fourteen models named Sift first on the direct prompt; zero named Forter. Both were named by all fourteen models and Sift carries 50 labels and Forter 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Sift and Forter were named in the same answer seventy-eight times, of the 180 answers naming Sift and the 99 naming Forter. In those answers Forter took the first choice four times and Sift twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Sift – if you don't have a dedicated risk team, due to complexity and false positives.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“specific complaints focus on the user experience and rule creation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-focused tools like Signifyd, Riskified, or Sift, which often target mid-market+ businesses and can cost thousands per month” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Sift — *Best Overall for Digital B2B Storefronts & ATO Protection*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend requesting demos from ClearSale, Sift, and SEON” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“A mid-market friendly, deployment-light option is Sift.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Riskified, Forter, and Kount” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Premium pricing: Listed at $120K/year on AWS Marketplace for under 1M decisions—significantly more expensive than competitors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you need enterprise-grade protection with chargeback guarantees (though they're primarily enterprise-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tier 1 (Enterprise/High Touch): Forter, Signifyd. (High cost, full liability guarantee, heavy focus on human-in-the-loop workflows).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Riskified or Forter for high-volume retail, international sales, and aggressive false-decline reduction.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the industry standard for high-volume transactions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.