Financial modeling and scenario planning for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial modeling software”, and as “scenario planning tool for finance”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
59%
Clear leader
59Anaplan08OneStream08Pigment24others
59% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Anaplan held the lead, +3 points on 56%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Excel22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Excel (22%) replaces Google Sheets (19% then, 22% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Excel19%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 14% → 19%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan59%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
Microsoft Excel22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Excel (22%) replaces Google Sheets (19% then, 22% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Excel19%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 14% → 19%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan59%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Anaplan59%12%49endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.56% → 59%
Anaplan59%12%49endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.56% → 59%02
Workday Adaptive Planning8%13%38accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%
Workday Adaptive Planning8%13%38accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%03
OneStream8%5%21accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
OneStream8%5%21accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%04
Pigment8%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%
Pigment8%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%05
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM4%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM4%11%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%06
IBM Planning Analytics2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
IBM Planning Analytics2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Vena2%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Vena2%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Cube0%21%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Cube0%21%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
Prophix One0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Prophix One0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Planful0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Planful0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Excel vs Workday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Excel vs Prophix OneMicrosoft Excel vs CubeMicrosoft Excel vs VenaDatarails vs Google SheetsDatarails vs PigmentDatarails vs Workday Adaptive PlanningDatarails vs Prophix OneDatarails vs CubeDatarails vs VenaGoogle Sheets vs PigmentGoogle Sheets vs Workday Adaptive PlanningGoogle Sheets vs Prophix OneGoogle Sheets vs CubeGoogle Sheets vs VenaPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs Prophix OnePigment vs CubePigment vs VenaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs Prophix OneWorkday Adaptive Planning vs CubeWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaProphix One vs CubeProphix One vs VenaCube vs Vena
One product takes 59% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lucidchart88%
7 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“diagramming-only tools (Lucidchart, draw.io, Visio, etc.) ... Designed for visual communication, not for production schema management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Visio100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“enterprises should be cautious about using static, general-purpose diagramming tools like Microsoft Visio, Lucidchart, and draw.io for production database design, as they can be disastrous” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
draw.io100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“static, general-purpose diagramming tools like Microsoft Visio, Lucidchart, and draw.io for production database design, as they can be disastrous” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Anaplan12%
6 of 49 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“its licensing is commonly based on solutions deployed, user types, model builders, and contract length, which can make total cost less straightforward to predict” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 877 links across 297 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Abacum19 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Datarails18 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ER/Studio13 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Anaplan11 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Fuelfinance11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Workday10 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware9 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 8 models
7 answers · 5 models
7 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial modeling software”, “financial modeling software”, “modeling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 59% | 483 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 | |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 8% | 8% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | |
| OneStream onestream.com | 8% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 |
| Pigment pigment.com | 8% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | |
| Limelight golimelight.com | 6% | 49 | 49,500 | 4,546 | 4,750 | 0 | |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 4% | 4% | 326 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 |
| IBM ibm.com IBM Planning Analytics 2% | 2% | 87 | 201,000 | 34,098 | 31,137,701 company | $2,518 | 118 |
| Vena venasolutions.com | 2% | 404 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 |
| Board board.com | 2% | 147 | 90,500 | 612,482 | 44,405 | 106 | |
| Planful planful.com | 0% | 357 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (abacum.ai, cubesoftware.com). The first result for “best financial modeling software” is intl.finebi.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial modeling software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which scenario planning tool for finance would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade modeling tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial modeling software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial modeling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which modeling tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AnaplanAnaplanHeldErwin Data ModelerAnaplanno first choiceagainst: ER/Studio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Three alternatives
Drivetrain, OneStream, VenaTwo alternatives
Drivetrain, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
ER/StudioTwo alternatives
Cube, VenaGPT-5.4 miniAnaplanAnaplanHeldSparx Systems Enterprise Architectagainst: LucidchartOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplanno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Board, IBM Planning Analytics, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
ERwin, IBM Software / IBM Engineering tools, Software AG ARIS, Visual ParadigmOne alternative
OneStreamGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentAnaplanChangedno first choiceIBM Planning Analyticsagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningPigmentagainst: Archi, IBM Rational Rose, Lucidchart, MagicDraw, Miro, PlantUML, Structurizr, Visio, draw.io
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
ARIS, Ardoq, Cameo Systems Modeler / MagicDraw, Erwin Data Modeler, LeanIX, SAP Signavio, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PigmentFour alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningPerplexity SonarAnaplanAnaplanHeldErwin Data Modeleragainst: IBM InfoSphere Data ArchitectLimelightagainst: Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: ER/Studio, ERwin, Lucidchart, Miro, MySQL Workbench, Navicat, Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler, SAP PowerDesigner, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Toad, Visio, draw.io, pgModeler
Six alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
IDERA ER/Studio, Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler, SAP PowerDesigner, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SqlDBM, dbtOne alternative
AnaplanGrok 4.20Anaplanagainst: Cube, Jirav, Microsoft ExcelAnaplanHeldErwin Data Modeler, IDERA ER/Studioagainst: SAP PowerDesignerAnaplanagainst: Cube, Jirav, Prophix One, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: AWS Bedrock, ChatGPT, Claude, Google Bard/Gemini, Hugging Face, Llama, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity AI, R, SAS, SPSS, Stable Diffusion, TensorFlow/Keras
Three alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion, VenaFour alternatives
Jedox, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PigmentMistral SmallAnaplanagainst: Microsoft ExcelAnaplanHeldno first choiceAnaplanno first choiceagainst: MySQL Workbench, SAP PowerDesigner
Four alternatives
Oracle Hyperion, Planful, Prophix One, Quantrix ModelerTwo alternatives
Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Cube, Limelight, OneStreamDeepSeek V4 FlashPigmentAnaplanChangedER/Studio, Erwin Data Modeleragainst: SAP PowerDesignerOneStreamagainst: Anaplan, Board, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Erwin Data Modeler, MySQL Workbench, SAP PowerDesigner, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Four alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Hackolade, Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler, SqlDBM, dbtOne alternative
CubeLlama 4 MaverickAnaplanno first choiceChangedno first choiceAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Visio, draw.io
One alternative
OneStreamQwen 3.7 FlashAnaplanAnaplan, PigmentChangedno first choiceLimelightno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Visio, draw.io
Five alternatives
Oracle Hyperion, Planful, Planning Analytics, Quantrix Modeler, VenaThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Planful, VenaKimi K2AnaplanAnaplan, OneStreamChangedno first choiceWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Venano first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Venaagainst: ARIS, Bizzdesign, PowerPoint, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio
Five alternatives
Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
IBM Planning AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXAnaplan, OneStreamAnaplanChangedno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Limelight, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Microsoft Power BI, OneStream, Venano first choiceagainst: ARIS, Lucidchart, MEGA HOPEX, Miro, MySQL Workbench, SAP PowerDesigner, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, dbt, draw.io
Five alternatives
Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion, Quantrix ModelerOne alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningMiniMax M2.5VenaAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceAnaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Centage Planning Maestro, Jirav, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Parallel, PlanGuru, SAP BPCno first choiceagainst: Borland Together, CA ERwin, Creately, Google Drawings, IBM Rational Rose, Internal Excel/Access-based "EA" spreadsheets, Lucidchart, Telelogic System Architect, Visio, draw.io
Six alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, IBM Planning Analytics, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, PlanfulOne alternative
Managely CloudGPT-6 LunaAnaplanAnaplanHeldno first choiceWorkday Adaptive Planningno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
AnaplanMuse Glimmer 30BAnaplan, BoardAnaplanChangedno first choiceLimelightagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 86 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 15 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 25 | 92 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 62 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:51 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 10 | 72 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 23 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 19 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:27 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:25 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 15 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 13 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 8 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:32 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 13 | 132 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:57 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
IBM InfoSphere read as IBM InfoSphere Data Architect
Microsoft Visio read as Visio
Microsoft Visio (standalone) read as Visio
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Enterprise Edition) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Enterprise Performance Management) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix read as Prophix One
Quantrix read as Quantrix Modeler
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Bedrock
AWS SageMaker
Alfabet
Azure ML
BiZZdesign Enterprise Studio
Bizzdesign Horion
Bizzdesign Horizzon
Borland Together
CA ERwin (older versions)
Cameo Systems Modeler / MagicDraw (Dassault Systèmes)
Creately (free tier)
Google Bard/Gemini (consumer versions)
Google Drawings
Hackolade Studio
IBM Software / IBM Engineering tools
IBM Watson
Internal Excel/Access-based "EA" spreadsheets
Llama (Meta's open models without fine-tuning controls)
MagicDraw
Managely Cloud
Navicat
Perplexity AI
Planning Analytics (IBM)
SPSS
SageMaker
Software AG ARIS
Sparx
Sparx/Cameo
Stable Diffusion
Structurizr
Telelogic System Architect
TensorFlow/Keras
Vertex AI
Visual Paradigm
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.