Board and investor reporting for enterprise buyers
Asked as “board reporting software”, and as “investor reporting tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · Workiva 20%
33Diligent Boards20Workiva06BoardPro41others
33% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Diligent Boards held the lead, +3 points on 30%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BoardPro27%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 29% → 27%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
OnBoard16%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 26% → 16%, −10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Diligent Boards33%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
BoardPro27%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 29% → 27%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketOnBoard16%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 26% → 16%, −10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDiligent Boards33%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Diligent Boards33%19%57endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.30% → 33%
Diligent Boards33%19%57endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.30% → 33%02
Workiva20%0%23accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 5% → 20%, +15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.5% → 20%
Workiva20%0%23accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 5% → 20%, +15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.5% → 20%03OnBoard6%5%42accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
OnBoard6%5%42accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%04
Nasdaq Boardvantage4%13%38accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 4%
Nasdaq Boardvantage4%13%38accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.12% → 4%05
AppDeck Board Portal4%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
AppDeck Board Portal4%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06Microsoft Power BI4%40%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07
Boardable4%46%13criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Boardable4%46%13criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Azeus Convene2%0%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Azeus Convene2%0%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12SharePoint0%92%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11
Board0%29%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Board0%29%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
BoardEffect0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BoardEffect0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Board Intelligence0%0%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Board Intelligence0%0%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
OnBoard vs Board IntelligenceOnBoard vs ZeckBoardable vs AppDeck Board PortalBoardable vs BoardProBoardable vs Board IntelligenceBoardable vs ZeckAppDeck Board Portal vs BoardProAppDeck Board Portal vs Board IntelligenceAppDeck Board Portal vs ZeckBoardPro vs Board IntelligenceBoardPro vs ZeckBoard Intelligence vs Zeck
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405M06
0708091011S12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Diligent Boards33%
Diligent Boards33%02Workiva20%
Workiva20%03OnBoard6%
OnBoard6%04Nasdaq Boardvantage4%
Nasdaq Boardvantage4%05AppDeck Board Portal4%
AppDeck Board Portal4%06Microsoft Power BI4%
07Boardable4%
Boardable4%08Azeus Convene2%
Azeus Convene2%09Board Intelligence0%
Board Intelligence0%10BoardEffect0%
BoardEffect0%11Board0%
Board0%12SharePoint0%
What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SharePoint
92%
11 of 12 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“ordinary Google Docs/SharePoint workspaces as the primary board archive. They can create inconsistent permissions, weak version control” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Diligent Boards19%
11 of 57 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“AI‑driven recommendation indexes label Diligent as a hard negative for enterprises, specifically citing per‑user/per‑director cost scaling” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Dropbox100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Using services like Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint (for direct file distribution), or standard email for board materials is a major anti-pattern in enterprise governance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Google Drive100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Examples to avoid for board packages: Standard Google Drive, Dropbox, Box (without enterprise governance rules)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 944 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Board Intelligence29 answers · 38 citations · 14 models
vendor site · AppDeck28 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Diligent27 answers · 62 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Capterra26 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Board16 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Nasdaq15 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Fast.io13 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best board reporting software”, “board reporting software”, “board reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diligent diligent.com Diligent Boards 33%, Diligent One Platform 0% | 33% | 272 | 165,000 | 6,449 | 317,551 company | $287 | 120 | 9 |
| Workiva workiva.com | 20% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 8 |
| OnBoard onboardmeetings.com | 6% | 262 | 22,200 | 9,635 | 46,823 | $87,989 | 34 | 3 |
| Q4 q4inc.com | 6% | 9 | 14,800 | 8,117 | 6,064 | $10 | 12 | |
| BoardPro boardpro.com | 6% | 202 | 390 | 20 | 3,012 | 2 | ||
| Nasdaq IR Insight nasdaq.com Nasdaq Boardvantage 4%, Nasdaq IR Insight 0% | 4% | 180 | 1,300 | 16 | 21,233,250 | $57 | 53 | |
| AppDeck appdeck.com AppDeck Board Portal 4% | 4% | 37 | 20 | 0 | 185 company | |||
| Microsoft Power BI | 4% | 14,800 | 515 | |||||
| Boardable boardable.com | 4% | 179 | 3,600 | 23 | 56,590 | 21 | 5 | |
| Azeus Convene azeusconvene.com | 2% | 94 | 110 | 0 | 79,195 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (board.com, boardintelligence.com, diligent.com, onboardmeetings.com). The first result for “best board reporting software” is board-room.org.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best board reporting software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which investor reporting tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade board reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best board reporting software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a board reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which board reporting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceWorkivaChangedBoard IntelligenceDiligent Boardsagainst: Cube, Venano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
IRmetrrics, Nasdaq Investor Relations, VIR, eSpeedNine alternatives
Azeus Convene, BoardEffect, Cube, Datarails, Diligent Boards, OnBoard, Report Writer, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardGPT-5.4 miniDiligent BoardsWorkivaChangedDiligent BoardsOnBoardno first choiceagainst: Notion, SharePoint, Teams
Five alternatives
Azeus Convene, Board, Board.com, Govenda, Nasdaq BoardvantageTwo alternatives
Nasdaq IR Insight, Q4Four alternatives
Aprio Board Portal, Azeus Convene, BoardEffect, OnBoardOne alternative
Diligent BoardsGemini 3.5 FlashDiligent Boards, WorkivaCartaChangedDiligent Boards, WorkivaWorkivaagainst: Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantageno first choiceagainst: Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, SharePoint, Tableau, WeTransfer
Eight alternatives
Anaplan, Board Intelligence, Causal, Mosaic, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, Workday Adaptive Planning, ZeckSix alternatives
Intralinks, Nasdaq IR Insight, Q4, Shareworks, Workiva, iDealsFour alternatives
Board, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardThree alternatives
Board, Govenda, OnBoardPerplexity SonarDiligent BoardsWorkivaChangedDiligent Boards, Diligent One PlatformBoardProagainst: Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardno first choiceagainst: Google Docs, Notion, SharePoint, Slack
Three alternatives
Aleph, Board Intelligence, PlanfulFour alternatives
Abacum, Dynamo, Juniper Square, Q4Six alternatives
Azeus Convene, Board, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, WorkivaOne alternative
Diligent BoardsGrok 4.20Diligent Boardsagainst: BoardEffectQ4Changedagainst: Carta, DynamoDiligent Boardsagainst: Microsoft Power BI, TableauDiligent Boardsagainst: BoardableDiligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantageagainst: BoardProagainst: BoardEffect, Boardable, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft Power BI, SharePoint, Tableau
Four alternatives
Azeus Convene, Board Intelligence, OnBoard, WorkivaFour alternatives
Broadridge, Nasdaq IR Insight, Notified, WorkivaFour alternatives
BoardEffect, Ideals Board, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardTwo alternatives
Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardTwo alternatives
Ideals Board, OnBoardMistral SmallFairviewWorkivaChangedAzeus ConveneAppDeck Board Portal, OnBoardno first choiceagainst: Board, Diligent Boards, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint
Three alternatives
Aleph, Azeus Convene, Board Intelligence Board PortalThree alternatives
Abacum, Dynamo, Q4 PlatformThree alternatives
Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Governance Services, OnBoardOne alternative
Diligent BoardsDeepSeek V4 FlashDiligent BoardsWorkivaChangedDiligent Boardsagainst: BoardPACBoardableagainst: Diligent Boards, OnBoardDiligent Boardsagainst: BoardPro, Boardable, Diligent Boards, Dropbox, Email, SharePoint, Teams
One alternative
Board IntelligenceFour alternatives
Broadridge, Maxio, Nasdaq IR Insight, Q4Six alternatives
Admincontrol, Azeus Convene, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, iBabsOne alternative
Azeus ConveneFour alternatives
Aprio Board Portal, Azeus Convene, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDynamoChangedno first choiceBoardProagainst: Diligent Boardsno first choiceagainst: Diligent Boards, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint
Four alternatives
Abacum, Irwin, Q4 Platform, WorkivaOne alternative
BoardableQwen 3.7 FlashDiligent BoardsQ4, WorkivaChangedDiligent Boardsagainst: Nasdaq BoardvantageRoutefireDiligent Boardsagainst: Diligent Boards, Dropbox, Google Drive, Nasdaq Boardvantage, SharePoint
Three alternatives
AppBoard, OnBoard, OneTrustFour alternatives
Broadridge Investor Communications, Diligent OnBoard, Nasdaq Boardvantage, Nasdaq IR InsightTwo alternatives
Sherpany, WorkivaThree alternatives
BoardPAC, Diligent Boards, EnboarderThree alternatives
Azeus Convene, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardKimi K2Diligent BoardsShareworksChangedagainst: CartaDiligent Boards, Diligent One PlatformNasdaq Boardvantageagainst: Boardableno first choiceagainst: Diligent Boards
Three alternatives
Board Intelligence, ClearPoint Strategy, OnBoardOne alternative
J.P. Morgan Workplace SolutionsSix alternatives
BoardEffect, Cube, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
AppDeck Board Portal, Diligent One PlatformGLM 4.7 FlashXDiligent BoardsWorkivaChangedDiligent Boards, Nasdaq BoardvantageBoardableno first choiceagainst: Board, Diligent Boards, Dropbox, Email, Google Drive, SharePoint
Six alternatives
AppDeck Board Portal, Aprio Board Portal, Board, Board Intelligence, OnBoard, iBabsFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Cube, DFIN ActiveDisclosure, OneStreamFour alternatives
AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Boardable, OnBoardTwo alternatives
Ideals Board, Nasdaq BoardvantageMiniMax M2.5Diligent BoardsMicrosoft Power BIChangedDiligent BoardsAppDeck Board Portalno first choiceagainst: Board, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage, Notion, SharePoint
Three alternatives
Board, Board Intelligence, OnBoardFour alternatives
Abacum, Aleph, Diligent Boards, WorkivaFive alternatives
Azeus Convene, Board Intelligence, BoardPAC, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoardThree alternatives
Board.com, Diligent Boards, OnBoardGPT-6 LunaDiligent BoardsQ4ChangedDiligent Boards, Diligent One PlatformMicrosoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI
Three alternatives
Abacum, Nasdaq Boardvantage, PlanfulOne alternative
Nasdaq IR InsightFive alternatives
Board, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, WorkivaOne alternative
TableauMuse Glimmer 30BAzeus Convene, Diligent Boards, OnBoardWorkivaChangedDiligent BoardsBoardProagainst: Board, Boardable, Diligent Boardsno first choiceagainst: Boardable, Dropbox, Fireflies.ai, Google Drive, Microsoft, Otter.ai, SharePoint, Sherpany, Slack
Three alternatives
IRIS Software, Microsoft Power BI, Q4Nine alternatives
Board, Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Govenda, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Nasdaq Boardvantage, OnBoard, TableauOne alternative
BoardCloudBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:15 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:22 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 10 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 14 | 73 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 24 | 65 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 10 | 126 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 6 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 21 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:44 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 10 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:32 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 14 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AppDeck read as AppDeck Board Portal
Aprio read as Aprio Board Portal
Diligent read as Diligent Boards
Diligent (formerly BoardEffect) read as Diligent Boards
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Unresolved, counted raw
Board Cloud
Board Intelligence Minute Writer
Broadridge Investor Communications
CFO Particeps
Convene AI
Diligent BoardEffect
Diligent OnBoard
Diligent Smart Minutes
EQ/EquiTrax
ExecuTrust
Fireflies.ai
HRSoft/CompTrak
IQ Insights
IRIS Software
IRmetrrics
Nasdaq Governance Services
Nasdaq Investor Relations
Nymera
OnBoard Minutes AI
Otter.ai
Q4 Platform
Report Writer
Routefire
Secure Boards
TargetBoard
VIR (Virtual Investor Relations)
eSpeed
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.