Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Checkmarx CxSAST · November 2026 Edition

Static application security testing · Named, not ranked

Checkmarx CxSAST

checkmarx.com ↗

–Too few to rank

2/14Models named it

0First choices

2Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inStatic application security testing #54 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Checkmarx CxSAST has 1.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“Legacy enterprise SAST tools (like Micro Focus Fortify or Checkmarx CxSAST) often fail in modern mid-market environments”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Checkmarx CxSAST, over the 2 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
SonarQube	2	0	View →
Snyk Code	1	1	View →
GitHub Advanced Security	1	0	View →
OpenText Fortify	1	0	View →
Semgrep AppSec Platform	1	0	View →
Veracode Static Analysis	1	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

At a glance

Stated on Checkmarx CxSAST's own site, not checked by Gane.

Also from Checkmarx: Checkmarx ASPM, Checkmarx Codebashing, Checkmarx DAST, Checkmarx One, Checkmarx One ASPM, Checkmarx SCA

Visit checkmarx.com ↗

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Checkmarx CxSAST came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 1 of the 2 answers that named Checkmarx CxSAST and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aikido.dev1

arxiv.org1

contrastsecurity.com1

corgea.com1

cycode.com1

deepsource.com1

dev.to1

dl.acm.org1

fluidattacks.com1

github.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Checkmarx CxSAST came from a third party's page.

Pages cited

aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sast-tools1

arxiv.org/pdf/2307.163251

contrastsecurity.com/infographics/appsec-noise-and-fatigue-by-the-numbers1

corgea.com/blog/sonarqube-alternatives1

cycode.com/blog/ai-sast-tools1

deepsource.com/resources/static-analysis-tools1

dev.to/flawpilot/how-to-choose-a-sast-tool-8-open-source-options-and-a-broader-security-pl1

dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3691621.36949471

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Checkmarx CxSAST across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0