Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › SOAR › Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect
SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition

Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect

Eleven of fourteen models named Tines first on the direct prompt; one named Rapid7 InsightConnect. Tines was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Rapid7 InsightConnect by ten and Tines carries 57 labels and Rapid7 InsightConnect 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Tines

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Rapid7 InsightConnect

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share47%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5719A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Tines reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Swimlane Turbine was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs Shuffle · Tines vs Swimlane Turbine · Tines vs Cortex XSOAR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TinesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRapid7 InsightConnect
Direct111
Paraphrase80
Comparative10
Budget-constrained40
Scale-constrained10
Negative402 against Rapid7 InsightConnect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Tines and Rapid7 InsightConnect were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 182 answers naming Tines and the 60 naming Rapid7 InsightConnect. In those answers Rapid7 InsightConnect took the first choice zero times and Tines twenty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Tines and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Tines Rapid7 InsightConnect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tines on the left and Rapid7 InsightConnect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Tines and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.

Tines first, Rapid7 InsightConnect an alternative

11 of 14 modelsRapid7 InsightConnect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine

Rapid7 InsightConnect first, Tines not the choice

1 of 14 modelsTines was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Tines leads by forty points.
Tines41%#1 of 13
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Tines leads by forty-five points.
Tines47%#1 of 13
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Tines leads by nine points.
Tines9%#2 of 11
Rapid7 InsightConnect0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Tines

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Platforms like Tines, Swimlane Turbine, or Torq offer modern visual workflow builders, lower playbook maintenance overhead, and multi-vendor neutrality.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies looking for a balance of power and usability, Tines is increasingly popular due to its agility and low barrier to entry.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“consider platforms like Tines or Shuffle, which are more aligned with the needs and budgets of smaller organizations” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Rapid7 InsightConnect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“These platforms have received mixed-to-negative reviews from some users” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 is more approachable but still requires significant tuning.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 InsightConnect (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Practical no-code automation and natural integration with Rapid7 products; specifically positioned for mid-market teams.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“mentioned as options that provide a good balance of cost and functionality for small to mid-sized businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tines vs ShuffleTines vs Swimlane TurbineTines vs Cortex XSOARTines vs ManageEngine Log360Tines vs Splunk SOARTines vs TorqShuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSplunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectTorq vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.