Two of fourteen models named Teramind first on the direct prompt; zero named Proofpoint Insider Threat Management. Teramind was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Proofpoint Insider Threat Management by ten and Teramind carries 48 labels and Proofpoint Insider Threat Management 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the insider risk management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Teramind and Proofpoint Insider Threat Management were named in the same answer thirty-nine times, of the 142 answers naming Teramind and the 67 naming Proofpoint Insider Threat Management. In those answers Proofpoint Insider Threat Management took the first choice four times and Teramind three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools/Types to Approach with High Caution or Avoid: Overly Surveillance-Heavy Tools (e.g., Teramind, Veriato, some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT)” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Flagged for performance issues and limited scalability in large enterprise environments... recommend against its use for large-scale deployments” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Categories to Avoid Entirely ... Teramind” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“the platforms that are most consistently called out for mid-market scale, price transparency and low analyst overhead are Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“If you need an affordable, ready-to-use software solution: Go with Teramind or ActivTrak.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Code42 Incydr or Teramind based on your priorities” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“this is typically a custom-quote enterprise solution, which may be pricier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise‑grade, expensive, and focused on investigation‑led workflows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“start with Purview if you're in M365, or Proofpoint/Varonis for enterprise scale” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“my default recommendation would be Proofpoint Insider Threat Management” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Proofpoint ObserveIT as your primary choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.