Data loss prevention · November 2026 Edition
Safetica ONE vs Cyberhaven
Two of fourteen models named Safetica ONE first on the direct prompt; zero named Cyberhaven. Safetica ONE was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cyberhaven by nine and Safetica ONE carries 32 labels and Cyberhaven 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Safetica ONE
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels3216A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Safetica ONE reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview DLP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview DLP vs Safetica ONE · Microsoft Purview DLP vs Cyberhaven · Safetica ONE vs Teramind DLP
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Safetica ONEFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyberhaven
Direct20
Paraphrase40
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Safetica ONE
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Safetica ONE and Cyberhaven stood in it.
| Model | DirectSO | ParaphraseSO | ComparativeSO | Budget-constrainedSO | Scale-constrainedSO | NegativeSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | SO | | SO | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SO | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | SO | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | SO | SO | SO | SO | SO | |
| Grok 4.20 | SO | SO | SO | | ||
| Mistral Small | SO | SO | SO | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SO | SO | SO | SO | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | SO | SO | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SO | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | SO | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SO | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | SO | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SO | |
SO Safetica ONE CyberhavenSO first choiceSO named as an alternativeSO argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Safetica ONE on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.
CyberhavenSO first choiceSO named as an alternativeSO argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Safetica ONE on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Safetica ONE and Cyberhaven stood in it.
Safetica ONE first, Cyberhaven not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCyberhaven was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONE alternatives: Kitecyber, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Qwen 3.7 FlashSafetica ONE alternatives: DoControl, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Netskope Next-Gen DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Strac
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Safetica ONE
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Kimi K2Next DLP alternatives: Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Safetica ONE leads by fifteen points.
Safetica ONE15%#3 of 14
Cyberhaven0%#9 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Safetica ONE leads by twelve points.
Safetica ONE14%#2 of 15
Cyberhaven2%#6 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Safetica ONE0%#– of 13
Cyberhaven0%#9 of 13What the models said about Safetica ONE
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Treat cautiously if independent buyer feedback matters; recent aggregated practitioner sentiment was mixed or negative” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“For independent SMB solutions, Kickidler or Safetica provide strong, affordable protection with device control capabilities.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market: Safetica ... frequently cited as the top choice for the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Safetica is the best default recommendation.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need more advanced features or have significant SaaS usage, Cyberhaven or Nightfall would be stronger choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview DLP vs Safetica ONEMicrosoft Purview DLP vs CyberhavenSafetica ONE vs Teramind DLPSafetica ONE vs Nightfall AISafetica ONE vs Netskope DLPSafetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorSafetica ONE vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPTeramind DLP vs CyberhavenNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNetskope DLP vs CyberhavenCyberhaven vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorCyberhaven vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DLP standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.