Axio360 vs ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Four of fourteen models named Axio360 first on the direct prompt; one named ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier. Axio360 was named by eight of the fourteen models and ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier by twelve and Axio360 carries 18 labels and ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Axio360
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cyber risk quantification page.
By framing
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Axio360 and ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 48 answers naming Axio360 and the 49 naming ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier. In those answers ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier took the first choice one time and Axio360 two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectAXTR | ParaphraseAXTR | ComparativeAXTR | Budget-constrainedAXTR | Scale-constrainedAXTR | NegativeAXTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | TR | TR | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AX | AXTR | AX | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | TR | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | AX | AXTR | AX | |||
| Mistral Small | TR | AX | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | AXTR | AXTR | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | AXTR | TR | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | AX | AXTR | AX | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | TR | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | TR | TR | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | AX | AXTR | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | AX | AXTR |
The direct prompt
Axio360 first, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier an alternative
4 of 14 modelsThreatConnect Risk Quantifier was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier first, Axio360 not the choice
1 of 14 modelsAxio360 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Axio360
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“often start at thousands to tens of thousands per year (plus potential consulting), making them unsuitable for tight budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Axio360 represents the best balance of capability, executive communication value, and reasonable cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Forrester's first CRQ Wave recently ranked RiskLens and Axio as leaders” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Axio360 — *Best Overall for Pragmatic Setup & Board/CFO Reporting*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“often start at thousands to tens of thousands per year (plus potential consulting), making them unsuitable for tight budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier or Kovrr as they offer the best balance of capability, usability, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Need a formal, repeatable FAIR program? Start with SAFE One and ThreatConnect RQ.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, which maps threats and vulnerabilities to financial-loss scenarios.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.