Cyber risk quantification · November 2026 Edition
Axio360 vs Axio
Four of fourteen models named Axio360 first on the direct prompt; zero named Axio. Axio360 was named by eight of the fourteen models and Axio by ten and Axio360 carries 18 labels and Axio 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Axio360
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%25%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1816A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Axio360 reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio360 · CyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio · Kovrr vs Axio360
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cyber risk quantification page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Axio360First choices, of fourteen modelsAxio
Direct40
Paraphrase01
Comparative11
Budget-constrained001 against Axio360 · 1 against Axio
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Axio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Axio360 and Axio stood in it.
| Model | DirectAX | ParaphraseAX | ComparativeAX | Budget-constrainedAX | Scale-constrainedAX | NegativeAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AX | AX | | AX | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | AX | | AX | AX | ||
| Mistral Small | AX | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | AX | AX | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | AX | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | AX | | AX | AX | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | AX | AX | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | AX | AX |
AX Axio360 AxioAX first choiceAX named as an alternativeAX argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Axio360 on the left and Axio on the right.
AxioAX first choiceAX named as an alternativeAX argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Axio360 on the left and Axio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Axio360 and Axio stood in it.
Axio360 first, Axio not the choice
4 of 14 modelsAxio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashAxio360 alternatives: Bitsight Financial Quantification, Kovrr, SAFE Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashAxio360 alternatives: Balbix, Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
GPT-6 LunaAxio360 alternatives: CyberStrong, SAFE One
Muse Glimmer 30BAxio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, CyberStrong alternatives: C-Risk
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarCyberSaint CyberStrong alternatives: Axio, Balbix, LogicGate Risk Cloud, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Grok 4.20Kovrr alternatives: Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security, vCISO Lite
Llama 4 MaverickCyber Quant alternatives: Axio360, Risk Cloud Quantify, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Kimi K2CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE Security alternatives: Axio360, FortifyData
GLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard alternatives: Axio, SAFE Security
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Black Kite alternatives: Nisura, UpGuard
GPT-5.4 miniX-Analytics alternatives: Bitsight Financial Quantification, SecurityScorecard, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Mistral SmallKovrr, SAFE Security alternatives: Optro, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Qwen 3.7 FlashX-Analytics alternatives: Kovrr, SAFE Security
MiniMax M2.5Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier alternatives: Ostrich Cyber Risk
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
What the models said about Axio360
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“often start at thousands to tens of thousands per year (plus potential consulting), making them unsuitable for tight budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Axio360 represents the best balance of capability, executive communication value, and reasonable cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Forrester's first CRQ Wave recently ranked RiskLens and Axio as leaders” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Axio360 — *Best Overall for Pragmatic Setup & Board/CFO Reporting*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Axio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like SAFE Security, Axio, or Balbix if budget is tight” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms (e.g., Safe Security (SAFE One), Kovrr, Axio) - generally not recommended for B2B SMBs.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms like Kovrr and Axio have faced criticism in niche reviews for being overly focused on insurance market dynamics” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“SAFE and Axio frequently lead in recent Forrester evaluations” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd lean toward Kovrr or Axio” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Scenario-based modeling with historical industry loss library, positioned around cyber insurance premium alignment.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio360CyberSaint CyberStrong vs AxioKovrr vs Axio360Kovrr vs AxioAxio360 vs SAFE SecurityAxio360 vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierAxio360 vs RiskLensSAFE Security vs AxioThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs AxioAxio vs RiskLensAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full cyber risk quant standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.