Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Patching › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Patch management for small business buyers

Asked as “patch management tool”, and as “OS and third-party patching solution”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
54%
Clear leader
54Action119NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management06Automox22others

54% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 55% → 54%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Action1 held the lead, −1 point on 55%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Action154%0%52endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 55% → 54%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.55% → 54%
02NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management19%7%55accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 19% → 19%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 19%
03Automox6%2%43accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
04ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus6%11%45accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
05Patch My PC4%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06Microsoft Intune2%15%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
07PDQ Deploy & Inventory2%7%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Windows Server Update Services2%76%17criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Microsoft Configuration Manager0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10ManageEngine Endpoint Central0%31%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
09Atera0%0%19accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Action154%
02NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management19%
03Automox6%
04ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus6%
05Patch My PC4%
06Microsoft Intune2%
07PDQ Deploy & Inventory2%
08Windows Server Update Services2%
09Atera0%
10ManageEngine Endpoint Central0%
11Microsoft Configuration Manager0%

What they warned about

Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Windows Server Update Services
76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Traditional tools like Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) alone are heavily criticized by IT recommendation models for small businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Configuration Manager
80%
8 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“You generally want to avoid heavy legacy systems (like System Center/SCCM) unless you already have an Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
31%
5 of 16 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Often criticized for a cluttered, outdated interface, steep learning curve... small businesses may struggle with setup and ongoing management.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
11%
5 of 45 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Why be cautious: These tools often come with steep learning curves, cluttered interfaces, and complex menu structures designed for large IT departments.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 744 links across 145 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 24 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

43 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
41 answers · 77 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Action125 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · NinjaOne23 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Splashtop20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · ManageEngine16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · PDQ15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
vendor site · LogMeIn13 answers · 13 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best patch management tool”, “patch management tool”, “patch management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Action1 action1.com54%2558,1008718,854$3,801485
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management ninjaone.com19%1420316,268$17,2261184
Automox automox.com6%1343,6005264,075$83218
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 6%, ManageEngine Endpoint Central 0%
6%2448,100675
Patch My PC patchmypc.com4%534,40014418,9831
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Intune 2%
2%3862,240,000403,136
PDQ Deploy pdq.com
PDQ Deploy & Inventory 2%, PDQ Connect 0%, PDQ 0%
2%241,90046184,243$1,72029
Action1 RMM2%
Microsoft Update for Business2%
Ninety Pro2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (action1.com, manageengine.com, ninjaone.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best patch management tool” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best patch management tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which OS and third-party patching solution would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top patch management tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best patch management tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a patch management tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which patch management tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceMicrosoft Update for BusinessChanged
Two alternativesWindows Server Update Services, Windows Update for Business
Action1, Atera
Three alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Spiceworks Patch Manager, Windows Server Update Services
Four alternativesCanonical Landscape, Foreman, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Syncro
no first choiceagainst: Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Patch My PC, SolarWinds Patch Manager
GPT-5.4 miniManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Three alternativesAutomox, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Microsoft IntuneChanged
Three alternativesJamf, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Windows Autopatch
Action1
Five alternativesAtera, Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Patch My PC
against: PDQ Connect
no first choiceagainst: Acronis Cyber Protect, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Patch My PC
Gemini 3.5 FlashAction1
Five alternativesAutomox, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect, Patch My PC
Action1Held
Three alternativesAutomox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Patch My PC
Action1
Five alternativesAutomox, JumpCloud, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ
Action1
Four alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune / Windows Update for Business, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
against: Windows Server Update Services
Action1
Two alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager, Tanium Patch
against: Ansible, Custom PowerShell/Bash scripts, HCL BigFix, Ivanti Endpoint Manager, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Puppet, Windows Server Update Services, default Windows Update, macOS Software Update
Perplexity SonarAction1
Four alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect
against: Microsoft Intune
Action1Held
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune
Action1
Five alternativesAtera, Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect
against: Microsoft Intune
Action1
Three alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Connect
no first choiceagainst: Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, Qualys VMDR, Tanium Patch
Grok 4.20Action1
Two alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
against: HCL BigFix, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, Microsoft Intune, Windows Server Update Services, Windows Update for Business
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
Three alternativesAtera, Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Endpoint Central
against: Microsoft Intune
Action1, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAtera, Automox, Iru, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager
Action1
Four alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAtera, Automox, JumpCloud, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager, Windows Server Update Services
against: Automox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SolarWinds Patch Manager, Windows Server Update Services
Mistral SmallAction1
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
Three alternativesAtera, Datto RMM, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Action1
Five alternativesJumpCloud, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Ninite Pro, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Automox, Ninety Pro
Two alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Scalefusion
against: Kaseya VSA
against: Windows Server Update Services
DeepSeek V4 FlashAction1
Three alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Action1Held
Three alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1
Three alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Action1
Four alternativesAutomox Patch, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Action1, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Two alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
against: Kaseya VSA, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Configuration Manager, SolarWinds Patch Manager, Windows Server Update Services
Llama 4 MaverickAction1
Three alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1Held
Two alternativesAutomox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
no first choiceAutomox
Four alternativesAction1, Itarian, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Ninite Pro
no first choiceagainst: Avast Business Patch Management, Avira Software Updater, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Configuration Manager, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Qwen 3.7 FlashAction1 RMM
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
against: Lansweeper
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
One alternativeAutomox
Automox
Three alternativesGFI MAX Patch Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, SolarWinds Patch Management
against: Microsoft Configuration Manager, System Center
Patch My PC
Two alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
against: Windows Server Update Services
Action1
Three alternativesAutomox, Ninite Pro, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
against: ManageEngine Endpoint Central, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Windows Server Update Services
Kimi K2Action1
Four alternativesAtera, JumpCloud, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1Held
Four alternativesJumpCloud, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Windows Update for Business
Action1
Four alternativesAtera, Automox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Patch My PC
Action1
Three alternativesMicrosoft Intune, PDQ Deploy & Inventory, Patch My PC
against: Windows Server Update Services
Automox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Three alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
against: HCL BigFix, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Windows Server Update Services
GLM 4.7 FlashXNinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAutomox, LogMeIn Resolve, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Patch My PC
NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementHeld
Four alternativesAutomox, Avast Business Patch Management, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Action1, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Three alternativesDatto RMM, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Splashtop Autonomous Endpoint Management
Action1
Three alternativesAnsible, Opsi, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
no first choiceagainst: BatchPatch, GFI LanGuard, LabTech, MSPanywhere, SolarWinds Patch Manager, Windows Server Update Services, Winget
MiniMax M2.5NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Four alternativesAction1, Automox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Ninite Pro
Action1, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch ManagementChanged
Three alternativesManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, PDQ, Patch My PC
Action1
Four alternativesAtera, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, PDQ Connect
Action1
Two alternativesAutomox, Itarian
no first choiceagainst: Kaseya VSA, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
GPT-6 LunaAction1
Three alternativesAutomox, Microsoft Intune, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1Held
One alternativeMicrosoft Intune
Action1
Four alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune, PDQ Connect
against: NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1
Three alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Intune
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BAction1
Three alternativesAutomox, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Patch My PCChanged
Two alternativesAutomox, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1
Two alternativesManageEngine Endpoint Central / Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
Action1, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Two alternativesNinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Patch My PC
no first choiceagainst: Avast Business Patch Management, BatchPatch, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management, Windows Server Update Services
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:38no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:59yes24 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:25yes818 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:13yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:34yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:24yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:55yes2416 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:38yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:59yes523 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:16yes840 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:27yes1015 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:47yes829 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:27yes412 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:20yes1019 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:19no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:54yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:38yes820 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:47yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:52yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:49no04 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:52yes2324 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:01yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:47yes538 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:56yes1115 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:21yes1426 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:18yes1366 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:26yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:08yes1424 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:47yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:18yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:19no015 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:17yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:34yes518 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:17yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:44yes2435 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:45yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:50no033 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:20yes1939 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:08yes2060 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:59yes1324 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:54yes629 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:02yes2345 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:21no04 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:59yes56 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:47yes516 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:09yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:05yes58 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:30yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:30yes1013 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:07yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:32no028 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:52yes1548 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:08yes2448 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:41yes519 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:53yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:07yes1516 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:16no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:08no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:16yes313 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:51yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:35yes1414 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:09no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:38yes1935 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:41yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:22yes1040 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:48yes1018 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:11yes1026 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:51no011 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:31yes415 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:18yes1519 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:28yes1710 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:01yes38 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:07no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:48yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:18yes1814 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:21yes88 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:54yes2230 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:40yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:27yes1027 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:39yes1977 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:57yes2591 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:44yes1552 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:22yes414 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:42yes1934 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acronis read as Acronis Cyber Protect
Datto read as Datto RMM
Heimdal read as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management
Ivanti read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
Ivanti Neurons read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
Kaseya read as Kaseya VSA
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Free Edition read as ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Microsoft Intune + Windows Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
Microsoft Intune / Windows Autopatch read as Microsoft Intune
N-able read as N-able N-central
NinjaOne read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne (formerly NinjaRMM) read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne Patch Management read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
NinjaOne Patch Management (Formerly NinjaRMM) read as NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management
PDQ Deploy read as PDQ Deploy & Inventory
PDQ Deploy (by Immeris) read as PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
SCCM read as Microsoft Configuration Manager
SCCM (System Center Configuration Manager) read as Microsoft Configuration Manager
Tanium read as Tanium Patch
Unresolved, counted raw
Action1 RMM
Automox Patch
Custom PowerShell/Bash scripts
Endpoint Manager (Intune)
GFI MAX Patch Management
LabTech (ConnectWise)
MSPanywhere (formerly ConnectWise Control/ScreenConnect)
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Cloud
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Endpoint Central
Microsoft Update for Business
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)
Open‑AudIT
SecPod Saner CVEM
SolarWinds Patch Management
Spiceworks Patch Manager
Splashtop Autonomous Endpoint Management (AEM)
default Windows Update
macOS Software Update
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ObservabilityProcess mining →