Eight of fourteen models named Ardoq first on the direct prompt; zero named Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. Ardoq was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect by thirteen and Ardoq carries 53 labels and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the enterprise architecture tools page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Ardoq and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 152 answers naming Ardoq and the 67 naming Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. In those answers Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect took the first choice six times and Ardoq twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“$30K–$120K+ annually” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“commercial SaaS tools like Ardoq, OrbusInfinity, ADOIT, or Bizzdesign are stronger, but usually cost more” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cons: The graph-centric approach can have a steep learning curve for architects used to traditional UML.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For fast-start, collaborative teams: Start with Ardoq or SAP LeanIX (leaders in Gartner reports for innovation and stakeholder engagement).” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with SAP LeanIX if you have SAP investments, or Ardoq if you need strong collaboration features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Need unlimited users from the start, dynamic visual “digital twin” and easy collaboration with live data feeds → Ardoq.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Verdict: Avoid for large, distributed teams; consider only for small technical teams with heavy modeling needs” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently cited as having the steepest learning curve and the highest number of negative labels among EA tools.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to Avoid ... Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect - Why to avoid: Extremely steep learning curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“The standout "best value" answer for most small-to-mid companies is Sparx Enterprise Architect” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect remains the most cost-effective solution on the market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is the strongest overall choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.