Fourteen AI models were asked for endpoint protection platform six ways each, on behalf of a small, a mid-market and an enterprise B2B company: 252 answers, in which a judge labeled 90 products. Seven of them carry at least 10 labels and a first choice, and are ranked. This guide walks the top seven in the order the mid-market standing puts them, with what the models said for and against each, in their words. Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads at 25% of first choices, and the standing is contested.
| Product | First-choice share | Negative rate | Labels | Leads for | Quadrant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25% | 0% | 16 | Small business, Mid-market | accepted challenger | |
| 2 | 23% | 8% | 50 | Enterprise | accepted challenger | |
| 3 | 12% | 2% | 43 | none | accepted challenger | |
| 4 | 12% | 12% | 50 | none | accepted challenger | |
| 5 | 10% | 0% | 24 | none | accepted challenger | |
| 6 | 10% | 33% | 48 | none | criticized challenger | |
| 7 | 2% | 9% | 23 | none | accepted challenger |
The full standing, every product with 10 labels or more, is on the category page, with the products at zero and the ones warned against.
A product is on the record because a model named it in an answer and the judge labeled the naming: first choice, alternative, mention, caution or warning, each with the sentence it came from. 90 products were named for endpoint protection platform this edition.
A product is ranked once it carries 10 labels in a segment and at least one first choice there. Below that it is named but not ranked, and it says so on its page. The vendor table that folds spellings into products is versioned; this page was scored under v2026-11.3.
The same categories are asked again with nothing changed to measure how much an answer moves on its own. A change in share smaller than the floor is not reported as a change. The repeat, model by model.
| Framing | The question |
|---|---|
| Direct | What is the best endpoint protection platform for a mid-market B2B company? |
| Paraphrase | Which business antivirus and endpoint security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company? |
| Comparative | What are the top endpoint protection platforms and how do they differ? |
| Budget-constrained | What is the best endpoint protection platform for a company with a limited budget? |
| Scale-constrained | We are a 500 person company evaluating an endpoint protection platform. What should we look at? |
| Negative | Which endpoint protection platforms should I avoid or be cautious about? |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is #1 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 25% of first choices, from 16 labels by 12 of 14 models; 0% of those labels were cautions or warnings. One of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. It led the paraphrase, budget-constrained framings. By buyer: small business #1 of 7 at 49%; mid-market #1 of 7 at 25%; enterprise unranked.
No positive label in this category carried a quote.
No negative label in this category carried a quote.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is #2 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 23% of first choices, from 50 labels by 14 of 14 models; 8% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Four of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. It led the direct, scale-constrained framings. By buyer: small business #5 of 7 at 5%; mid-market #2 of 7 at 23%; enterprise #1 of 5 at 53%.
“Defender is usually the most natural choice because it connects closely with Intune, Entra ID, Microsoft Sentinel, and Microsoft 365 security workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“While leading enterprise EDRs (CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex XDR) are highly effective, you must evaluate vendor operational maturity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
Bitdefender GravityZone is #3 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 12% of first choices, from 43 labels by 14 of 14 models; 2% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Zero of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. It led the negative framing. By buyer: small business #3 of 7 at 11%; mid-market #3 of 7 at 12%; enterprise #4 of 5 at 2%.
“I recommend starting with either Microsoft Defender (if using Windows) or Bitdefender GravityZone for the best balance of protection and cost.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Non-Microsoft or mixed OS estate, want the strongest cost/performance NGAV: Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security Premium.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Not positioned in the Leaders quadrant, meaning some gaps in completeness of vision or execution compared to the top tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
Sophos Intercept X is #4 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 12% of first choices, from 50 labels by 14 of 14 models; 12% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Three of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. By buyer: small business #2 of 7 at 11%; mid-market #4 of 7 at 12%; enterprise unranked.
6 of 14 models argued against it somewhere in their answers, 1 as a warning.
“Primary Recommendation: Sophos Intercept X - Best balance of features, pricing, and management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, Sophos Intercept X and ESET PROTECT are the best value options” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Both could allow arbitrary code execution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Users report significant performance issues, including slow system performance on older hardware, high resource usage, and a steep learning curve” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
SentinelOne Singularity is #5 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 10% of first choices, from 24 labels by 13 of 14 models; 0% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Three of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. By buyer: small business unranked; mid-market #5 of 7 at 10%; enterprise #3 of 5 at 2%.
No positive label in this category carried a quote.
No negative label in this category carried a quote.
CrowdStrike Falcon is #6 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 10% of first choices, from 48 labels by 14 of 14 models; 33% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Three of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. It led the comparative framing. By buyer: small business unranked; mid-market #6 of 7 at 10%; enterprise #2 of 5 at 34%.
11 of 14 models argued against it somewhere in their answers, 1 as a warning.
“Known for its cloud-native approach, AI-powered threat detection, and strong EDR/XDR capabilities... making it a favorite for enterprises” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“CrowdStrike pioneered cloud-native EDR... Widely regarded as having best-in-class threat intelligence and threat-hunting capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Avoid pricier options like CrowdStrike Falcon or SentinelOne unless you have a bigger budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“these are often designed for large enterprises with dedicated security analysts. For a mid-sized company, switching to these might introduce management overhead” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
ESET PROTECT is #7 of 7 for the mid-market buyer at 2% of first choices, from 23 labels by 12 of 14 models; 9% of those labels were cautions or warnings. Zero of fourteen models named it first on the direct question. By buyer: small business unranked; mid-market #7 of 7 at 2%; enterprise unranked.
“Sophos Intercept X and ESET PROTECT are the best value options” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Reviewers report agents losing connection with the management console, requiring reinstallation on affected machines.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“MITRE ATT&CK 2024: ~56% detection — surprisingly low for a historically solid vendor” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
| Framing | Named first most often | Then |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | CrowdStrike Falcon (3), SentinelOne Singularity (3), Sophos Intercept X (3) | |
| Paraphrase | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (4), Bitdefender GravityZone (3), SentinelOne Singularity (2) | |
| Comparative | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (2), SentinelOne Singularity (2), CrowdStrike (1) | |
| Budget-constrained | Bitdefender GravityZone (3), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (2), Comodo Dragon Platform (1) | |
| Scale-constrained | CrowdStrike Falcon (1) | |
| Negative | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (1) |
| Buyer | Leads | Then |
|---|---|---|
| Small business | Sophos Intercept X, Bitdefender GravityZone, Huntress Managed EDR | |
| Mid-market | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Bitdefender GravityZone, Sophos Intercept X | |
| Enterprise | CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Bitdefender GravityZone |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, in 25% of first choices for a mid-market B2B company in the November 2026 Edition, from 16 labels. The standing is contested: the models did not settle on one product.
Small business: Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 49%. Mid-market: Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 25%. Enterprise: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 53%. Each standing is computed within its segment and never pooled.
The direct, paraphrase, budget and scale framings count toward share. The product named first differs by framing: direct Microsoft Defender for Endpoint; paraphrase Microsoft Defender for Cloud; comparative CrowdStrike Falcon; budget-constrained Microsoft Defender for Cloud; scale-constrained Microsoft Defender for Endpoint; negative Bitdefender GravityZone. The table above has the counts.
The repeat measurement is published with the next edition.
Fourteen of the fourteen models return sources. Their 75 answers here cite 871 pages; the sites cited most are microsoft.com, g2.com, av-comparatives.org. The category page lists them all.
No. A product is on the record because a model named it. A vendor can claim its page, propose corrections to the vendor table and be told when its standing moves; it cannot change a label, a share or a rank, and the publisher's conflicts are disclosed on the method page.
The page is published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.