Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Endpoint protection › Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Bitdefender GravityZone
Endpoint protection · November 2026 Edition
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Bitdefender GravityZone
One of fourteen models named Microsoft Defender for Cloud first on the direct prompt; zero named Bitdefender GravityZone. Microsoft Defender for Cloud was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Bitdefender GravityZone by fourteen and Microsoft Defender for Cloud carries 16 labels and Bitdefender GravityZone 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share25%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%2%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1643A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Defender for Cloud reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint · Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Sophos Intercept X · Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the endpoint protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Defender for CloudFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBitdefender GravityZone
Direct10
Paraphrase53
Comparative001 against Bitdefender GravityZone
Budget-constrained73
Scale-constrained00
Negative01
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Bitdefender GravityZone stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Bitdefender GravityZone first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Defender for Cloud on the left and Bitdefender GravityZone on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Bitdefender GravityZone stood in it.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud first, Bitdefender GravityZone an alternative
1 of 14 modelsBitdefender GravityZone was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Cloud alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, Sophos Intercept X
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarSophos Intercept X alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
Grok 4.20CrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Mistral SmallCrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Sophos Intercept X
Llama 4 MaverickSentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Gemini 3.5 FlashSentinelOne Singularity alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X with MDR
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Qwen 3.7 FlashSophos Intercept X alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Kimi K2SentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
GLM 4.7 FlashXSophos Intercept X alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaSophos Endpoint with Sophos MDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads by thirty-eight points.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud49%#1 of 13Bitdefender GravityZone11%#3 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads by thirteen points.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud25%#1 of 12Bitdefender GravityZone12%#3 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: Bitdefender GravityZone leads at enterprise.
Bitdefender GravityZone2%#4 of 12Microsoft Defender for Cloud0%#– of 12What the models said about Microsoft Defender for Cloud
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Bitdefender GravityZone
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Not positioned in the Leaders quadrant, meaning some gaps in completeness of vision or execution compared to the top tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I recommend starting with either Microsoft Defender (if using Windows) or Bitdefender GravityZone for the best balance of protection and cost.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Non-Microsoft or mixed OS estate, want the strongest cost/performance NGAV: Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security Premium.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value: Bitdefender GravityZone ... widely considered the leader for cost-effective enterprise protection” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Sophos Intercept XMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne SingularityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs ESET PROTECTMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender GravityZoneBitdefender GravityZone vs Sophos Intercept XBitdefender GravityZone vs SentinelOne SingularityBitdefender GravityZone vs CrowdStrike FalconBitdefender GravityZone vs ESET PROTECTAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full endpoint protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.