1inch vs Uniswap
Zero of fourteen models named 1inch first on the direct prompt; zero named Uniswap. 1inch was named by ten of the fourteen models and Uniswap by fourteen and 1inch carries 17 labels and Uniswap 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.
By framing
1inchFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUniswap
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, 1inch and Uniswap were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 41 answers naming 1inch and the 84 naming Uniswap. In those answers Uniswap took the first choice thirteen times and 1inch six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
1inch Uniswap first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 1inch on the left and Uniswap on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
1inch4%#4 of 11Uniswap2%#5 of 11What the models said about 1inch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“most analysts would not recommend using a retail crypto DEX directly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Start with 1inch on Polygon or Arbitrum for the best balance of low costs, flexibility, and scalability” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“1inch for general trading offer the best combination of low fees and reliability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Use reputable aggregators like 1inch or CowSwap for better routing and less slippage.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Uniswap
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“using a raw DEX (like Uniswap) for corporate treasury is risky due to liquidity issues, volatility, and lack of regulatory protection” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“More than 58% of rug pulls in 2024 happened on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap and PancakeSwap.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not the absolute cheapest on mainnet (0.25–0.3% + high gas)... avoid for tiny budgets on Ethereum L1” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best DEX platform for a company with a limited budget is Uniswap on Base or Arbitrum, as it has low fees, sufficient liquidity for major pairs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Uniswap, Curve, and dYdX have proven resilient over multiple years, making them generally more trustworthy choices.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“The dominant leader in total trading volume and TVL... choose Uniswap for maximum liquidity and asset variety” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.