Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › DEX › 1inch vs Jupiter
Digital employee experience · November 2026 Edition

1inch vs Jupiter

Zero of fourteen models named 1inch first on the direct prompt; zero named Jupiter. 1inch was named by ten of the fourteen models and Jupiter by eight and 1inch carries 17 labels and Jupiter 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

1inch

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Jupiter

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 1inch reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Nexthink Infinity vs 1inch · Nexthink Infinity vs Jupiter · ControlUp vs 1inch

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
1inchFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJupiter
Direct001 against 1inch
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained21
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Jupiter
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, 1inch and Jupiter were named in the same answer fifteen times, of the 41 answers naming 1inch and the 28 naming Jupiter. In those answers Jupiter took the first choice zero times and 1inch four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 1inch and Jupiter stood in it.
ModelDirectJUParaphraseJUComparativeJUBudget-constrainedJUScale-constrainedJUNegativeJU
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashJU
Perplexity SonarJU
Grok 4.20JUJU
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashJU
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 LunaJU
Muse Glimmer 30BJU
1inchJU Jupiter first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 1inch on the left and Jupiter on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 1inch and Jupiter stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: ControlUp, ServiceNow DEX, TeamViewer DEX
Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, Omnissa Experience Management, TeamDynamix DEX
Perplexity SonarControlUp alternatives: Nexthink Infinity
Grok 4.20Nexthink Infinity alternatives: 1E, ControlUp, HP Workforce Experience Platform, Lakeside
Mistral SmallNexthink Infinity alternatives: ControlUp, ManageEngine DEX Manager Plus
DeepSeek V4 FlashControlUp alternatives: Coinbase Institutional, Kraken Institutional, TeamViewer DEX, dYdX
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashNexthink Infinity, ServiceNow alternatives: Amazon, Coinbase Prime, Faire, Kraken Institutional, Nectar, Tactio
Kimi K21E alternatives: ControlUp, Riverbed Aternity, TeamViewer DEX
GLM 4.7 FlashXNexthink Infinity alternatives: ControlUp, Lakeside Software, Omnissa Experience Management, TeamViewer DEX
MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity
GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity
Muse Glimmer 30BControlUp alternatives: TeamViewer DEX

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Jupiter leads by two points.
Jupiter7%#3 of 8
1inch4%#4 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: 1inch leads at mid-market.
1inch4%#4 of 11
Jupiter2%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
1inch leads by four points.
1inch4%#– of 9
Jupiter0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 1inch

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“most analysts would not recommend using a retail crypto DEX directly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Start with 1inch on Polygon or Arbitrum for the best balance of low costs, flexibility, and scalability” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“1inch for general trading offer the best combination of low fees and reliability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Use reputable aggregators like 1inch or CowSwap for better routing and less slippage.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Jupiter

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Fast and cheap, but Solana's ecosystem is rife with meme coin scams and honeypots.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Jupiter (Solana) | Cheapest execution; lowest slippage.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Jupiter rules Solana with ~$2B daily volume, especially for memecoin and aggregated swaps.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your company uses Solana, it's an aggregator with near-zero fees and blazing speed” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Nexthink Infinity vs 1inchNexthink Infinity vs JupiterControlUp vs 1inchControlUp vs JupiterPancakeSwap vs 1inchPancakeSwap vs Jupiter1inch vs Uniswap1inch vs Curve Finance1inch vs HyperliquidUniswap vs JupiterCurve Finance vs JupiterHyperliquid vs JupiterAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.