Uniswap vs Jupiter
Zero of fourteen models named Uniswap first on the direct prompt; zero named Jupiter. Uniswap was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Jupiter by eight and Uniswap carries 30 labels and Jupiter 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Jupiter
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.
By framing
UniswapFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJupiterAcross every category in the November 2026 Edition, Uniswap and Jupiter were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 84 answers naming Uniswap and the 28 naming Jupiter. In those answers Jupiter took the first choice three times and Uniswap eleven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectJU | ParaphraseJU | ComparativeJU | Budget-constrainedJU | Scale-constrainedJU | NegativeJU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | JU | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | JU | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | JU | | JU | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | JU | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | JU | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | JU | |
UniswapJU Jupiter first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Uniswap on the left and Jupiter on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Uniswap2%#5 of 11What the models said about Uniswap
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“using a raw DEX (like Uniswap) for corporate treasury is risky due to liquidity issues, volatility, and lack of regulatory protection” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“More than 58% of rug pulls in 2024 happened on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap and PancakeSwap.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not the absolute cheapest on mainnet (0.25–0.3% + high gas)... avoid for tiny budgets on Ethereum L1” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best DEX platform for a company with a limited budget is Uniswap on Base or Arbitrum, as it has low fees, sufficient liquidity for major pairs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Uniswap, Curve, and dYdX have proven resilient over multiple years, making them generally more trustworthy choices.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“The dominant leader in total trading volume and TVL... choose Uniswap for maximum liquidity and asset variety” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jupiter
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Fast and cheap, but Solana's ecosystem is rife with meme coin scams and honeypots.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Jupiter (Solana) | Cheapest execution; lowest slippage.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Jupiter rules Solana with ~$2B daily volume, especially for memecoin and aggregated swaps.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your company uses Solana, it's an aggregator with near-zero fees and blazing speed” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.