September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Network and edge › WAF · September 2026 Edition

Web application firewalls

Asked as “web application firewall”, and as “WAF and bot protection service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
89%
Clear leader
89Cloudflare WAF04AWS WAF02Cloudflare Bot Management04others

89% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Cloudflare WAF89%5%62endorsed leader
02AWS WAF4%12%40accepted challenger
03Fastly Next-Gen WAF2%14%22accepted challenger
04Sucuri WAF2%10%10accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08ModSecurity0%56%18criticized challenger
05Imperva Cloud WAF0%29%41criticized challenger
06Akamai App & API Protector0%20%30accepted challenger
07Barracuda Web Application Firewall0%18%17accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

One product takes 89% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Ten of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.4 mini changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ModSecurity
56%
10 of 18 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid: Unmanaged Open Source (ModSecurity/CoreRuleSet) ... Do not install this unless you have a dedicated security engineer” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Imperva Cloud WAF
29%
12 of 41 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid assuming Imperva's signature protections are sufficient — independent tests show they miss most attacks.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Akamai App & API Protector
20%
6 of 30 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Why Not Akamai or Enterprise F5 for Mid-Market? ... you're paying for capacity you don't need.” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
AWS WAF
12%
5 of 40 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“Out of the box, AWS WAF is essentially a blank canvas... It requires deep cloud-engineering expertise to manage, meaning high operational overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 843 links across 200 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · open-appsec37 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CyberPress30 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Radware18 answers · 31 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Imperva18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Fastly16 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Indusface12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow11 answers · 11 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best web application firewall”, “web application firewall”, “web application firewalls”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare WAF 89%, Cloudflare Bot Management 2%
91%185550,00010,897
AWS parent site
AWS WAF 4%, AWS WAF + Bot Control 0%
4%154368,000114,001
Fastly Next-Gen WAF fastly.com2%61700107,961$2,460120
Sucuri WAF sucuri.net2%6770187,61315
Imperva Cloud WAF imperva.com0%124902417,309
Akamai parent site
Akamai App & API Protector 0%
0%9627,1001,614
Barracuda parent site
Barracuda Web Application Firewall 0%, Barracuda WAF 0%
0%18201,00010,561
Fortinet parent site
Fortinet FortiWeb 0%
0%4149,5002,339
open-appsec openappsec.io0%99011,6512
F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF f5.com0%50500178,423$5120

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aimultiple.com, indusface.com, openappsec.io). The first result for “best web application firewall” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best web application firewall for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which WAF and bot protection service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top web application firewalls and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best web application firewall for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a web application firewall. What should we look at?”Negative“Which web application firewalls should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS WAF, Cloudflare WAF
One alternativeFortinet FortiWAF
against: ModSecurity, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFChanged
Two alternativesAWS WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Five alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, Azure WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, ModSecurity
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniCloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF
Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare WAFChanged
Three alternativesAkamai App & API Protector, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Six alternativesAWS WAF, Coraza, F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF, ModSecurity
Cloudflare WAF
One alternativeAWS WAF
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare WAF
Two alternativesFastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: AWS WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Two alternativesDataDome, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Five alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, F5 Advanced WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Four alternativesAWS WAF, BunkerWeb, Sucuri WAF, open-appsec
Cloudflare WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Four alternativesAWS WAF, Azure WAF, Indusface AppTrana, Prophaze WAF
against: AWS WAF, ModSecurity
Perplexity SonarCloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Azure WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall
against: Akamai App & API Protector, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Four alternativesBarracuda WAF, Cequence Security, DataDome, FortiWeb
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Seven alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, Barracuda WAF, F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Imperva Cloud WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Two alternativesBunkerWeb, Sucuri WAF
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20Cloudflare WAF
One alternativeBarracuda WAF
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Four alternativesAWS WAF + Bot Control, Barracuda WAF, F5 Distributed Cloud, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Four alternativesAWS WAF, ModSecurity, Sucuri WAF, Wordfence
Cloudflare WAF
Two alternativesAWS WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: AWS WAF, Azure WAF, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Cloudflare WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Google Cloud Armor, Imperva Cloud WAF, ModSecurity, Shadow Daemon, Veles
Mistral SmallCloudflare WAF
One alternativeBarracuda WAF
against: Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Two alternativesBarracuda Web Application Firewall, Reblaze
Cloudflare WAF
Eight alternativesAkamai App & API Protector, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Imperva Cloud WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Wallarm WAF, open-appsec
Cloudflare WAF, Sucuri WAF
One alternativeopen-appsec
no first choiceagainst: Artofdefence Hyperguard Web Application Firewall, Radware AppWall, phion airlock Web Application Firewall
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare WAF
Two alternativesAWS WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall
against: Akamai App & API Protector, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
One alternativeAWS WAF
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
Akamai App & API Protector, Cloudflare WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Four alternativesAWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Radware Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Five alternativesModSecurity, OWASP Core Rule Set, SafeLine, Sucuri WAF, open-appsec
no first choiceagainst: Akamai App & API Protector, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF, ModSecurity
Llama 4 MaverickCloudflare WAF
Two alternativesBarracuda Web Application Firewall, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeldno first choiceCloudflare WAF
Two alternativesModSecurity with OWASP Core Rule Set, Sucuri WAF
no first choiceagainst: Artofdefence Hyperguard Web Application Firewall, Radware AppWall, phion airlock Web Application Firewall
Qwen 3.7 FlashCloudflare WAF
Two alternativesAWS WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: F5 BIG-IP
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Four alternativesAWS WAF, Amazon Shield, Azure Front Door, F5 Advanced WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Four alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: ModSecurity
Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesCoraza WAF, ModSecurity, StackPath
no first choiceagainst: AWS WAF, Azure Firewall WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Cisco, Google Cloud Armor, ModSecurity, Netscreen, OWASP Core Rule Set
Kimi K2Cloudflare WAF
One alternativeBarracuda WAF
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Five alternativesAWS WAF + Bot Control, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service, DataDome, HUMAN Bot Defender, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: Akamai App & API Protector, F5 BIG-IP
Cloudflare WAF
Five alternativesAWS WAF, Akamai App & API Protector, F5 BIG-IP, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: ModSecurity
Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesCoraza, ModSecurity, Sucuri WAF
AWS WAF, Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAkamai App & API Protector, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: AWS WAF, Azure WAF, Cloudflare WAF, Google Cloud Armor, ModSecurity, Radware Cloud WAF
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, F5 BIG-IP
against: Akamai App & API Protector, Imperva Cloud WAF, Sucuri WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Three alternativesAkamai App & API Protector, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Imperva Cloud WAF
no first choiceCloudflare WAF
Three alternativesBunkerWeb, ModSecurity + OWASP CRS, Sucuri Basic Platform
against: Imperva Cloud WAF
no first choiceagainst: Barracuda Web Application Firewall, ModSecurity
MiniMax M2.5Cloudflare WAF
Three alternativesAWS WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAFHeld
Three alternativesAWS WAF + Bot Control, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Five alternativesAWS WAF, F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF, Radware Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
One alternativeSucuri WAF
against: Akamai App & API Protector, Imperva Cloud WAF
Cloudflare WAF
Two alternativesBarracuda Web Application Firewall, Imperva Cloud WAF
against: F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF
against: Coraza, ModSecurity
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:48no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:34yes49 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:37yes1227 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:18yes205 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:39yes4420 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:15yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:12yes1819 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:51yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:24yes935 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:35yes922 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:15yes12103 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:25yes925 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:27yes169 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 14:01yes58 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:24yes1528 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:39yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:35yes169 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:00yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:29yes1014 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:25yes94 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:35no047 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:59yes1062 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:31yes1880 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:13yes537 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:44yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:51yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:16yes2027 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:09yes209 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:21yes2615 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:20yes911 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-09-17 13:40yes2879 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 14:08yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:55no039 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:11yes1050 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:13no0139 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 14:15yes518 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:34yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:23yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:44yes1219 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:05yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:50yes179 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:47yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:58yes1014 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:41yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:13no035 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:56yes1020 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 14:09yes2759 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:45yes517 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:59no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:47no013 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:49yes1124 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:12yes207 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 13:18yes1715 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:33no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:56yes1823 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:02yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:38no038 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:12yes923 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:00yes14114 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:18yes526 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:54yes178 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:54yes44 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:38yes2421 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:45yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:08yes4216 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:43yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:51yes2744 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:49yes85 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:42no041 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:59yes2634 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:24yes2461 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:44yes1020 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS WAFv2 read as AWS WAF
Akamai read as Akamai App & API Protector
Barracuda read as Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Barracuda (WAAP) read as Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Barracuda (WAF & ESG appliances) read as Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Check Point CloudGuard read as Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare WAF
Cloudflare (Free Plan) read as Cloudflare WAF
Cloudflare (Free Tier) read as Cloudflare WAF
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall read as Cloudflare WAF
F5 read as F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF
F5 (BIG-IP Advanced WAF / NGINX App Protect / Distributed Cloud WAAP) read as F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF
Fastly read as Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Fastly (Signal Sciences) read as Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Fastly WAF read as Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Human Security (PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Bot Defender
Imperva read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva (Cloud WAF/Advanced WAF) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva (Incapsula) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva (WAF) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva Professional read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva WAF read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva WAF (now Thales) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva WAF (part of Thales) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva Web Application Firewall read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Imperva Web Application Firewall (by Thales) read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Incapsula read as Imperva Cloud WAF
Prophaze read as Prophaze WAF
Radware read as Radware Cloud WAF
Sucuri read as Sucuri WAF
Sucuri Firewall read as Sucuri WAF
open-appsec / CloudGuard WAF read as open-appsec
open-appsec/CloudGuard read as open-appsec
open‑appsec CloudGuard read as open-appsec
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Shield
Azure Firewall WAF
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service
DenyAll
Fortinet FortiWAF
Google Cloud WAF
HUMAN Technologies
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway (WAF)
Netscreen
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud WAF
Shadow Daemon
Sucuri Basic Platform
Veles
Wallarm WAF
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← SD-WANZTNA →