Index › IT › Network and edge › Network monitoring › ManageEngine OpManager vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Network monitoring and management · November 2026 Edition

ManageEngine OpManager vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Five of fourteen models named ManageEngine OpManager first on the direct prompt; zero named SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor. ManageEngine OpManager was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor by thirteen and ManageEngine OpManager carries 44 labels and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ManageEngine OpManager

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share24%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4435A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ManageEngine OpManager reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Paessler PRTG Network Monitor was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager · Zabbix vs SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor · ManageEngine OpManager vs Auvik

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ManageEngine OpManagerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Direct50
Paraphrase701 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Comparative25
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained01
Negative011 against ManageEngine OpManager · 4 against SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 239 answers naming ManageEngine OpManager and the 105 naming SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor. In those answers SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor took the first choice three times and ManageEngine OpManager nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ManageEngine OpManager SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ManageEngine OpManager on the left and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor stood in it.

ManageEngine OpManager first, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor an alternative

5 of 14 modelsSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Grok 4.20ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, NinjaOne, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Mistral SmallManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Kentik, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine OpManager alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLogicMonitor alternatives: Auvik, Datadog Network Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Perplexity SonarPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Auvik, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Llama 4 MaverickZabbix alternatives: Checkmk, Kentik, ManageEngine OpManager, New Relic, NinjaOne
Kimi K2Auvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
GLM 4.7 FlashXPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Muse Glimmer 30BLogicMonitor alternatives: LiveNX, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-6 LunaAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ManageEngine OpManager leads by two points.
ManageEngine OpManager2%#6 of 11
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ManageEngine OpManager leads by twenty-two points.
ManageEngine OpManager24%#2 of 12
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor2%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
ManageEngine OpManager leads by eight points.
ManageEngine OpManager15%#2 of 15
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8%#5 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ManageEngine OpManager

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Part of a product line with frequent critical flaws ... High attack surface if not hardened.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“1. ManageEngine OpManager - a holistic network management software for performance monitoring, fault diagnosis, and troubleshooting.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Many organizations banned it entirely due to security concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The 2020 SUNBURST supply-chain attack ... eroded trust. Ongoing vulnerabilities in the broader suite; use only with strict segmentation.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution is advised due to potential vulnerabilities and the need for rigorous security audits before deployment.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“The industry standard for pure network monitoring... extremely powerful packet-level troubleshooting; excellent reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SolarWinds NPM | Best Overall | Comprehensive network performance monitoring, strong alerting, intuitive interface” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For large, on‑prem networks with complex SNMP/flow needs: SolarWinds NPM or ManageEngine OpManager.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.