September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Network and edge › DDoS › Small business · September 2026 Edition

DDoS protection for small business buyers

Asked as “DDoS protection service”, and as “DDoS mitigation provider”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
89%
Clear leader
89Cloudflare04Gcore DDoS Protection02AWS Shield04others

89% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Cloudflare89%0%71endorsed leader
02Gcore DDoS Protection4%23%13accepted challenger
03AWS Shield2%14%57accepted challenger
04Sucuri2%0%37accepted challenger
05Azure DDoS Protection2%13%23accepted challenger
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Radware Cloud DDoS Protection0%73%15criticized challenger
11Akamai Prolexic0%67%36criticized challenger
09Imperva DDoS Protection0%50%26criticized challenger
08Fastly DDoS Protection0%33%12criticized challenger
07Google Cloud Armor Lab in the set0%12%17accepted challenger
06Flowtriq0%0%13accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud Armor is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

One product takes 89% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Ten of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small and Llama 4 Maverick changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Akamai Prolexic
67%
24 of 36 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“Akamai Prolexic is not suitable for small businesses due to its high cost and extensive features that exceed typical small business needs” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
73%
11 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid over-paying – services like Akamai Prolexic, Radware, and F5 are excellent for massive enterprises but are rarely justified for a small team.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt
Imperva DDoS Protection
50%
13 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid these for now. These solutions are designed for large corporations” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
AWS Shield
14%
8 of 57 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“What to Avoid: ... AWS Shield Advanced ($3,000/month) – Only justified if you're a heavy AWS user” Kimi K2, direct prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 760 links across 147 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · CyberPress51 answers · 55 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Flowtriq46 answers · 96 citations · 11 models
41 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
26 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Indusface21 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Cloudflare15 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 13 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ddos protection service”, “ddos protection service”, “ddos protection services”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Cloudflare cloudflare.com89%421550,00010,8974,995,4131112
Gcore DDoS Protection gcore.com4%1520023,5249
AWS parent site
AWS Shield 2%, AWS WAF 0%
2%154368,000114,001
Sucuri sucuri.net2%415,40021187,61315
Azure parent site
Azure DDoS Protection 2%
2%64301,00047,904
Flowtriq flowtriq.com0%5100245
Google Cloud google.dev
Google Cloud Armor 0%
0%55165,0007,596881,346109
Indusface AppTrana indusface.com0%5110015,0070
Bunny.net bunny.net0%1091,3004422,08343
Fastly DDoS Protection fastly.com0%28700107,961$2,4601206

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudflare.com, g2.com, gartner.com). The first result for “best ddos protection service” is omr.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best DDoS protection service for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DDoS mitigation provider would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top DDoS protection services for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best DDoS protection service for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a DDoS protection service. What should we look at?”Negative“Which DDoS protection services should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Gcore DDoS Protection, Imperva DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
One alternativeAkamai Prolexic
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Flowtriq
Cloudflare
Three alternativesFlowtriq, Indusface AppTrana, Sucuri
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Prolexic
GPT-5.4 miniCloudflare
Five alternativesAWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, Azure DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Google Cloud Armor
against: Akamai Prolexic
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection
against: Fastly DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
One alternativeAWS Shield
against: Google Cloud Armor
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare
Two alternativesIndusface AppTrana, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Two alternativesIndusface AppTrana, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Five alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Fastly DDoS Protection, Project Shield, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield
Cloudflare
Six alternativesAWS Shield, AWS WAF, Azure DDoS Protection, Gcore DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Sucuri
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Imperva DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Perplexity SonarCloudflare
Two alternativesGcore DDoS Protection, Sucuri
CloudflareHeld
One alternativeFlowtriq
against: Akamai Prolexic, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Google Cloud Armor, Sucuri
against: Imperva DDoS Protection, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Flowtriq
no first choiceagainst: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, Azure DDoS Protection, Fastly DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Imperva DDoS Protection, NETSCOUT Arbor, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Grok 4.20Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Gcore DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Sucuri
Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, DDoS-Guard, Gcore DDoS Protection, Hyperfilter, OhzCloud, Path.net
Mistral SmallCloudflare
One alternativeGcore DDoS Protection
Cloudflare, Gcore DDoS ProtectionChanged
One alternativeFlowtriq
against: Akamai Prolexic
Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Flowtriq, Google Cloud Armor, Sucuri
Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Flowtriq, Google Cloud Armor
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor
against: Akamai Prolexic, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Imperva DDoS Protection, Indusface AppTrana, Sucuri
AWS Shield, Cloudflare
Two alternativesAzure DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor
against: Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Fastly DDoS Protection, Imperva DDoS Protection
against: Akamai Prolexic, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
against: Akamai Prolexic, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Llama 4 MaverickCloudflare, Gcore DDoS Protectionno first choiceChangedCloudflare
Two alternativesGcore DDoS Protection, Sucuri
Sucuri
Two alternativesCloudflare, Flowtriq
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic
against: Akamai Prolexic
Qwen 3.7 FlashCloudflare
One alternativeGcore DDoS Protection
against: Akamai Prolexic
CloudflareHeld
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Bunny.net
Cloudflare
Four alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Sucuri
against: Imperva DDoS Protection, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: Fail2ban, UFW
AWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protectionagainst: CentrixNodes, DDoS-Guard, Webyne, koddos.net
Kimi K2Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic
CloudflareHeld
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, Fastly DDoS Protection, Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
Cloudflare
One alternativeAWS Shield
against: NETSCOUT Arbor, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
against: Akamai Prolexic, DDoS-Guard, F5 Distributed Cloud DDoS, Gcore DDoS Protection
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
against: Imperva DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, Imperva DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Five alternativesAWS Shield, Fastly DDoS Protection, Google Cloud Armor, Imperva DDoS Protection, Sucuri
against: Akamai Prolexic, Azure DDoS Protection, F5, Nexusguard, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Sucuri
no first choiceagainst: Gcore DDoS Protection
MiniMax M2.5Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
CloudflareHeld
Three alternativesFlowtriq, Gcore DDoS Protection, Sucuri
Cloudflare
Two alternativesAWS Shield, Sucuri
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Flowtriq
Cloudflare
Three alternativesAWS Shield, Azure DDoS Protection, Imperva DDoS Protection
against: AWS Shield, Akamai Prolexic, F5 Silverline, Fastly DDoS Protection, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
against: Akamai Prolexic
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:31yes910 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:03yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:58yes716 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:27yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:15yes149 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:02yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 14:11yes811 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:03yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:32yes1448 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:13yes1224 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:24yes13310 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:11yes523 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:17yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:25yes37 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:11yes1224 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:17yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:37yes1512 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:33yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:42yes1519 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:58yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:30yes534 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:27no036 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:42yes1046 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:53yes1022 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:57yes1712 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:00yes78 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:15yes1525 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:32yes209 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 14:02yes2618 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:46yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:02yes1626 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:13yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 14:12yes526 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:16yes1449 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:41yes1175 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:24yes829 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:31yes99 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:23yes54 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:53yes1622 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:01yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:42yes2613 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:30yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 14:04yes1018 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:50yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:04no037 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:52yes1032 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:56yes24136 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:11yes526 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:02no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:12no012 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:06no012 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:40yes2010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:53yes129 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:20no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:05yes717 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:37yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:30no035 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:35no052 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:50yes1321 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:52no078 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:03yes1712 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:11no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:05yes2327 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:45yes2011 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:51yes3216 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:08yes139 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:38yes1822 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:58yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:47yes1447 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:59yes2241 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:19yes2640 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:44yes518 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS read as AWS Shield
Akamai read as Akamai Prolexic
Akamai (Prolexic) read as Akamai Prolexic
Azure DDoS read as Azure DDoS Protection
Fastly read as Fastly DDoS Protection
Gcore read as Gcore DDoS Protection
Google Cloud read as Google Cloud Armor
Imperva read as Imperva DDoS Protection
Imperva (FlexProtect) read as Imperva DDoS Protection
Imperva (Incapsula) read as Imperva DDoS Protection
Imperva (formerly Incapsula) read as Imperva DDoS Protection
Netscout read as NETSCOUT Arbor
Radware read as Radware Cloud DDoS Protection
Unresolved, counted raw
CentrixNodes
F5 Distributed Cloud DDoS
UFW (Uncomplicated Firewall)
koddos.net
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← DDI and IPAMDNS filtering →