Secure code training
Asked as “secure code training platform”, and as “developer security training”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform 18%
26SecureFlag18Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform12SafeStack Academy44others
26% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
02
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform18%19%52accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 18% now.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform18%19%52accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 18% now.Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
Veracode Security Labs0%11%19accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Veracode Security Labs0%11%19accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102
03
04
05A06
07Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01SecureFlag26%
SecureFlag26%02Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform18%
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform18%03SafeStack Academy12%
SafeStack Academy12%04Security Journey4%
Security Journey4%05Snyk Learn2%
Snyk Learn2%06Avatao0%
07Veracode Security Labs0%
Veracode Security Labs0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform19%
10 of 52 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Secure Code Warrior has the most consistent negative feedback and is the one I'd be most cautious about.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
SANS Developer Security Training50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Premier traditional option; ideal for teams wanting structured classroom-style courses (more expensive)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Veracode Security Labs11%
2 of 19 labels negative · 2 of 14 models
“Veracode Security Labs is more of a "high-cost, high-friction" concern than a quality problem per se.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Black Duck100%
1 of 1 labels negative · 1 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid high-end like Synopsys or Checkmarx Codebashing ($1K+/user or bundled).” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1017 links across 152 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · RansomLeak49 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge47 answers · 90 citations · 12 models
41 answers · 44 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G240 answers · 95 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Security Journey33 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Secure Code Warrior30 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SecureFlag25 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SecureFlag23 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 13 models
25 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best secure code training platform”, “secure code training platform”, “secure code training platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecureFlag secureflag.com | 26% | 135 | 480 | 0 | 935 | $94 | 8 | 8 |
| Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform securecodewarrior.com | 18% | 179 | 2,802 | 7 | 2 | |||
| SafeStack Academy safestack.io | 12% | 41 | 10 | 0 | 92 | 1 | ||
| PortSwigger Web Security Academy portswigger.net | 8% | 13 | 1,000 | 4 | 89,623 | |||
| RansomLeak ransomleak.com | 6% | 17 | 10 | 0 | 46 | |||
| Security Journey securityjourney.com | 4% | 103 | 390 | 8 | 1,490 | 10 | 5 | |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Learn 2% | 2% | 53 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Wizer wizer-training.com | 2% | 48 | 6,600 | 60 | 5,397 | 0 | ||
| OWASP Secure Coding Dojo owasp.org | 2% | 26 | 20 | 0 | 365,222 | 8 | ||
| Anagram Security | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.secureflag.com, gartner.com, reddit.com, securecodewarrior.com, secureflag.com, securityjourney.com). The first result for “best secure code training platform” is safestack.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best secure code training platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which developer security training would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top secure code training platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best secure code training platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a secure code training platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which secure code training platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceChangedagainst: SANS Developer Security TrainingSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSafeStack Academyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AppSecEngineer, SecureFlagFour alternatives
Codebashing, RansomLeak, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
Code Review Lab, Snyk Learn, SonarQube, WizerGPT-5.4 miniSecureFlagSecureFlagHeldSecureFlagSecureFlag’s Small Business Training planagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, secure-codes.com
Two alternatives
Immersive, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformTwo alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, SANS Developer Security TrainingFour alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
OWASP Security Knowledge Framework, OWASP Security Shepherd, Snyk LearnGemini 3.5 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldno first choiceOpenSSF "Developing Secure Software", PortSwigger Web Security Academyagainst: Immersive Labs, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: SANS Security Awareness
Three alternatives
AppSecEngineer, SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
SecureFlag, Security Journey, Snyk LearnSix alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureCodingHub, SecureFlag, Snyk LearnFour alternatives
Hacksplaining, OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, Snyk Learn, TryHackMeFour alternatives
Immersive Labs, SecureFlag, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsPerplexity SonarSecureFlagVeracode Developer TrainingChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagG2-listed platformno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformTwo alternatives
SANS Developer Security Awareness Training, SecureFlagFive alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, SafeStack Academy, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
OWASP resources, SourceForge-listed toolsGrok 4.20SecureFlag Secure Coding Trainingagainst: Veracode Security LabsPractical DevSecOpsChangedagainst: Coursera, SANS Developer Security TrainingSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagOWASP Secure Coding Dojoagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx CodebashingSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Udemy
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyThree alternatives
Avatao, OWASP resources, Security JourneyFour alternatives
Avatao, SafeStack Academy, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
Avatao, Hacksplaining, Kontra, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformTwo alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyMistral SmallRansomLeak, SecureFlag, Security Journeyno first choiceChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSafeStack Academy, Wizerno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Avatao, SafeStack AcademyThree alternatives
Avatao, Cybrary, SecureCodingHubDeepSeek V4 FlashSecureFlagSecureFlagHeldagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagPortSwigger Web Security AcademySecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlag, Veracode Security Labs
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyOne alternative
Security JourneyThree alternatives
HackerOne Security Knowledge Platform, SafeStack Academy, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
OpenSSF, SecureFlagFour alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsLlama 4 MaverickSecureFlagno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSecureFlagSafeStack Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformChangedagainst: SANS Developer Security TrainingCodebashingPortSwigger Web Security Academyagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Snyk Trainingno first choiceagainst: Code Nation, Coding Dojo, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Three alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, SafeStack Academy, Security JourneyFour alternatives
Avatao, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Symbiotic SecurityThree alternatives
SafeStack Academy, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
Coursera, GitHub Security Lab, OWASP WebGoatKimi K2Security JourneySafeStack Academy, Top 10 Dev TrainingChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformRansomLeak, SafeStack Academyno first choiceagainst: KnowBe4, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Three alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagThree alternatives
SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security LabsFive alternatives
Avatao, Kontra, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
PortSwigger Web Security Academy, Semgrep Academy, Snyk LearnGLM 4.7 FlashXSecureFlagno first choiceChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagGitHub Secure Code Game, OpenSSF Linux Foundation Educationno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyThree alternatives
HackTheBox, SANS Cyber Aces, TryHackMeFour alternatives
Anagram Security, Avatao, Checkmarx Codebashing, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
RansomLeak Training, SafeStack Academy, SecureFlagMiniMax M2.5SecureFlagAnagram Security, SecureFlagChangedno first choiceRansomLeak, SafeStack Academyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
SafeStack Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, WizerTwo alternatives
BSG Secure Development Lifecycle Training, Offensive360Two alternatives
SAFECode, Snyk LearnGPT-6 LunaSecureFlagSecureFlagHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagSnyk Learnno first choiceagainst: OWASP Secure Coding Dojo
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Snyk LearnTwo alternatives
PortSwigger Web Security Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformThree alternatives
Kontra, PortSwigger Web Security Academy, Security JourneyOne alternative
SecureFlag TrainingMuse Glimmer 30BSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlag - OWASPPortSwigger Web Security Academyno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
One alternative
SecureFlagTwo alternatives
Avatao, SANS Developer Security TrainingTwo alternatives
Security Journey, Snyk LearnSeven alternatives
DVWA, OWASP Juice Shop, OWASP's own site, OpenSSF, Security Journey, Snyk Learn, WizerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:38 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:24 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:38 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:34 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:12 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 14 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 22:59 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:16 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:52 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:23 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:52 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:09 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:24 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:15 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:28 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:39 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:11 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:47 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:52 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:35 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:34 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:15 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OWASP read as OWASP resources
SANS read as SANS Developer Security Training
SANS Institute – Developer Security Training read as SANS Developer Security Training
SafeStack read as SafeStack Academy
Secure Code Warrior read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Secure Code Warrior (SCW) read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
BSG Secure Development Lifecycle Training
Code Nation
Codenomicon
Company-specific programs
Contrast Secure Code Learning Hub
Cybrary for Teams
G2-listed platform(s)
GitHub Secure Code Game
GitHub Security Lab
HackTheBox
HackerOne Security Knowledge Platform
OWASP SKF/Juice Shop
OWASP Secure Coding Academy / Offensive360
OWASP Secure Coding Practices
OWASP Security Knowledge Framework (SKF)
OWASP's own site
Offensive Security (OSCP)
OpenSSF Linux Foundation Education
SANS Cyber Aces
SANS SEC540: Cloud Security and DevSecOps Automation
SecureCodeWarrior
SecureFlag - OWASP
SecureFlag Training
SecureFlag’s Small Business Training plan
Security Innovation Application Security Training
Snyk Training
SourceForge-listed tools
The "Developing Secure Software" course from the Linux Foundation
The Linux Foundation - LFD121
edX
secure-codes.com
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.