Colocation providers · November 2026 Edition
Equinix vs ColoCrossing
Two of fourteen models named Equinix first on the direct prompt; zero named ColoCrossing. Equinix was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ColoCrossing by twelve and Equinix carries 53 labels and ColoCrossing 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate32%67%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5312A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Equinix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Flexential was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Flexential vs Equinix · Flexential vs ColoCrossing · Equinix vs TierPoint
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the colocation providers page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EquinixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsColoCrossing
Direct203 against Equinix
Paraphrase503 against Equinix
Comparative110
Budget-constrained024 against Equinix
Scale-constrained00
Negative107 against Equinix · 8 against ColoCrossing
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Equinix and ColoCrossing were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 160 answers naming Equinix and the 35 naming ColoCrossing. In those answers ColoCrossing took the first choice two times and Equinix one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Equinix and ColoCrossing stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Equinix ColoCrossing first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Equinix on the left and ColoCrossing on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Equinix and ColoCrossing stood in it.
Equinix first, ColoCrossing not the choice
2 of 14 modelsColoCrossing was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniEquinix, TierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Flexential
Mistral SmallCoreSite, Equinix alternatives: Flexential, ServerMania
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, Digital Realty, Equinix
Llama 4 MaverickTierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, CoreSite, Equinix, ServerMania
GLM 4.7 FlashXTierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Digital Realty, Equinix, Flexential
GPT-6 LunaDataBank alternatives: CoreSite, Equinix, Flexential
Muse Glimmer 30BFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: Digital Realty, Equinix, ServerMania
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Gemini 3.5 FlashFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, TierPoint
Grok 4.20Flexential alternatives: DataBank, TierPoint
DeepSeek V4 FlashFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoreSite alternatives: Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, Liquid Power, Vantage Data Centers
Kimi K2Flexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
MiniMax M2.5CoreSite alternatives: DataBank, Flexential, TierPoint
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Equinix leads by two points.
Equinix2%#11 of 12ColoCrossing0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Equinix leads by sixty-six points.
Equinix66%#1 of 12ColoCrossing0%#– of 12What the models said about Equinix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: Premium names like Equinix or Digital Realty” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Equinix's SP4 site in S\u00e3o Paulo had a fire in 2025 affecting connectivity in part of the facility. That doesn't make Equinix broadly "bad," but it does show why you should evaluate the specific site” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Market giants (like Equinix, Digital Realty, or CoreSite) offer top-tier infrastructure, but their business models cater primarily to enterprises” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your goal is to be in the same facility as financial exchanges, major cloud providers, or telecom carriers, Equinix is usually the first choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Equinix – A global leader with a vast network of carrier-neutral data centers, offering interconnection, hybrid cloud, and edge services.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“my default "safe" recommendation is: 1. Equinix — best when you need rich interconnection, cloud adjacency, and lots of carrier options.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about ColoCrossing
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid providers that have a documented history of outages, poor support, or financial distress (e.g., ColoCrossing, INCERO, HorizonIQ, Cyxtera” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you want production reliability: ColoCrossing (especially Dallas), Cloudnium, and INCERO.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reviews on Trustpilot warn against using ColoCrossing due to issues with their services” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“providers with published 1U rates such as ColoCrossing $59/mo, GigeNET Chicago $99/mo or Sharktech $65-$99/mo are the lowest entry points” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Get a quote from Sharktech or ColoCrossing” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“ColoCrossing, offering colocation at $59 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Flexential vs EquinixFlexential vs ColoCrossingEquinix vs TierPointEquinix vs CoreSiteEquinix vs DataBankEquinix vs InterServerEquinix vs Digital RealtyTierPoint vs ColoCrossingCoreSite vs ColoCrossingDataBank vs ColoCrossingInterServer vs ColoCrossingDigital Realty vs ColoCrossingAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full colocation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.