Cloud security posture management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “cloud security posture management platform”, and as “CSPM tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
64%
Clear leader
64Wiz12Prisma Cloud10Microsoft Defender for Cloud14others
64% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 54% → 64%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Wiz held the lead, +10 points on 54%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Defender for Cloud33%Contested▲+12Since October 2026: 21% → 33%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-market
Wiz45%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 37% → 45%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseWiz64%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 54% → 64%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Microsoft Defender for Cloud33%Contested▲+12Since October 2026: 21% → 33%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketWiz45%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 37% → 45%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseWiz64%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 54% → 64%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Wiz64%15%72endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 54% → 64%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 64%
Wiz64%15%72endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 54% → 64%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.54% → 64%02
Prisma Cloud12%16%69accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%
Prisma Cloud12%16%69accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%03Microsoft Defender for Cloud10%19%67accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 10%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud10%19%67accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 10%04
Orca Security4%12%50accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
Orca Security4%12%50accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%05
Check Point CloudGuard2%41%17criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Check Point CloudGuard2%41%17criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
AWS Security Hub0%47%15criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
AWS Security Hub0%47%15criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08Lacework FortiCNAPP0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
06
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%13%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Tenable Cloud Security0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tenable Cloud Security0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Wiz vs AWS Security HubWiz vs Prisma CloudOrca Security vs Microsoft Defender for CloudOrca Security vs ProwlerOrca Security vs AWS Security HubOrca Security vs Prisma CloudMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs ProwlerMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security HubMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs Prisma CloudProwler vs AWS Security HubProwler vs Prisma CloudAWS Security Hub vs Prisma Cloud
One product takes 64% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Wiz15%
11 of 72 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for User-Based Predictability ... Wiz pricing is quote-only” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Prisma Cloud16%
11 of 69 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“analysts advise avoiding or carefully evaluating it unless your organization is already heavily invested in the Palo Alto ecosystem” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%
13 of 67 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“should be cautious about or avoid are: 1. Microsoft Defender for Cloud - Some AI models have given it a negative rating due to its complex interface, delayed detection, and frequent false positives” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Check Point CloudGuard41%
7 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Legacy or Standalone CSPM Tools (e.g., older CloudHealth, Dome9 pre-acquisition, or pure point solutions) ... Best avoided if” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 958 links across 271 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
43 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks28 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Orca24 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Microsoft20 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft20 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cloudaware20 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Wiz18 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud security posture management platform”, “cloud security posture management platform”, “cloud security posture management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiz wiz.io | 64% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 4 |
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 12% | 12% | 440 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 | |||
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 10% | 10% | 659 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | 4 |
| Orca Security orca.security | 4% | 379 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 | 2 |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| SentinelOne parent site SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 2% | 2% | 66 | 33,100 | 1,675 | ||||
| Uptycs uptycs.com | 2% | 28 | 390 | 4 | 1,457 | 0 | ||
| Check Point parent site Check Point CloudGuard 2%, Check Point Cloud Firewall 0% | 2% | 74 | 14,800 | 4,487 | ||||
| Google Security Command Center cloud.google.com | 2% | 46 | 170 | 9 | 7,405,347 | |||
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security 0% | 0% | 190 | 74,000 | 5,130 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersecuritynews.com, g2.com, learn.microsoft.com, microsoft.com, orca.security, paloaltonetworks.com, wiz.io). The first result for “best cloud security posture management platform” is sentinelone.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cloud security posture management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CSPM tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade cloud security posture management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud security posture management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a cloud security posture management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud security posture management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Orca Security, WizWizChangedPrisma CloudSentinelOne Singularity Cloud Securityagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, UpwindTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
Check Point Cloud Firewall, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, WizTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, Security Hub essentials planGPT-5.4 miniWizWizHeldWizCheck Point CloudGuardagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: Cyscale, InsightCloudSec, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Trend Vision OneOne alternative
AWS Security HubGemini 3.5 FlashWizWizHeldagainst: AWS Security Hub, GCP SCC, Microsoft Defender for CloudWizWizno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudPerplexity SonarWizWizHeldWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prowler, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk, Sophos
Six alternatives
Cloudaware, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, UpwindFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudTen alternatives
Aqua Security, Cloudaware, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Cloud SecurityOne alternative
Palo Alto Cortex Cloud, formerly Prisma CloudGrok 4.20Wizagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud SecurityWizHeldWizagainst: AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for CloudPrisma Cloudagainst: Orca Security, Uptycs, WizPrisma Cloudagainst: AWS Security Hub, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Google Security Command Center, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Oracle, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Wiz
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, WizMistral SmallWizPrisma Cloud, WizChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: Prisma Cloud
Four alternatives
InsightCloudSec, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Horizon CSPM, Orca SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashWizWizHeldWizAikido Securityagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizWizagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudTwo alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma CloudLlama 4 MaverickWizPrisma Cloud, WizChangedno first choiceWizno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security
Three alternatives
Check Point Cloud Firewall, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudQwen 3.7 FlashPrisma Cloud, WizWizChangedWizWizno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, IBM Security Command Center, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Netskope, Oracle OCI Native, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca SecurityTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityFour alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Qualys, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementKimi K2Orca Security, WizWizChangedWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloud, Wizagainst: Prisma Cloudno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, Prisma Cloud
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto CortexSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Tenable Cloud SecurityOne alternative
Cloudflare CASBGLM 4.7 FlashXWizWizHeldWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Prisma Cloudno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity, Tenable Cloud SecurityTwo alternatives
Nudge Security, WizMiniMax M2.5WizPrisma CloudChangedWizMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choiceagainst: Orca Security, Wiz
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, WizSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Tenable Cloud SecurityFour alternatives
CSPM.io Self-Hosted, Prisma Cloud, Prowler, WizGPT-6 LunaWizWizHeldWizagainst: Google Security Command CenterGoogle Security Command Centeragainst: AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Centerno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Versa CSPM, Wiz
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudFive alternatives
AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudSix alternatives
AWS Security Hub, Google Security Command Center, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, WizMuse Glimmer 30BWizWizHeldWizUptycsno first choiceagainst: Bionic, Check Point CloudGuard, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFive alternatives
Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
AWS Security Hub, Cloudflare CASB, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, ProwlerBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:16 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:22 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 19 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:11 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:59 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 22 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:54 | yes | 24 | 253 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 30 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 24 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 22 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 23 | 82 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 21 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:28 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:07 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:42 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:32 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 24 | 278 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 2 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:26 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:00 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 25 | 115 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:51 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 21 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 24 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 4 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Check Point read as Check Point CloudGuard
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Datadog Cloud Security read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Datadog Security read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
FortiCNAPP read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
FortiCNAPP (Lacework) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Fortinet read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework (FortiCNAPP) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework (Fortinet) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Lacework (now part of Fortinet) read as Lacework FortiCNAPP
Orca read as Orca Security
Orca (SideScanning) read as Orca Security
Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto (Prisma) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Octopus / Xpanse) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Tenable read as Tenable Cloud Security
Tenable (Prisma Cloud / Tenable.io) read as Tenable Cloud Security
Unresolved, counted raw
CSPM.io Self-Hosted
CrowdStrike Falcon Horizon CSPM
Drift Security
Fortinet Lacework
IBM Security Command Center
Oracle OCI Native
Palo Alto Cortex Cloud, formerly Prisma Cloud
SecPod Saner Cloud
Security Hub essentials plan
Trend Micro One
Versa CSPM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.