Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Interview scheduling › ModernLoop vs GoodTime
Interview scheduling · November 2026 Edition

ModernLoop vs GoodTime

Eleven of fourteen models named ModernLoop first on the direct prompt; three named GoodTime. Both were named by all fourteen models and ModernLoop carries 42 labels and GoodTime 54, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ModernLoop

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

GoodTime

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share28%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4254A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ModernLoop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ModernLoop vs Calendly · ModernLoop vs Koalendar · ModernLoop vs Cal.com

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ModernLoopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGoodTime
Direct1132 against GoodTime
Paraphrase232 against GoodTime
Comparative14
Budget-constrained004 against ModernLoop · 6 against GoodTime
Scale-constrained10
Negative112 against GoodTime
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ModernLoop and GoodTime were named in the same answer 113 times, of the 117 answers naming ModernLoop and the 166 naming GoodTime. In those answers GoodTime took the first choice thirty-four times and ModernLoop fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ModernLoop and GoodTime stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ModernLoop GoodTime first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ModernLoop on the left and GoodTime on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ModernLoop and GoodTime stood in it.

ModernLoop first, GoodTime an alternative

11 of 14 modelsGoodTime was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5ModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, GoodTime, Prelude
Gemini 3.5 FlashModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, GoodTime, candidate.fyi
Grok 4.20ModernLoop alternatives: Grayscale, Prelude
DeepSeek V4 FlashModernLoop alternatives: Calendly
Llama 4 MaverickModernLoop alternatives: Calendly, GoodTime
Qwen 3.7 FlashCalendly, ModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever
Kimi K2ModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime
GLM 4.7 FlashXModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Grayscale
MiniMax M2.5ModernLoop alternatives: Cal.com, GoodTime, VidCruiter
GPT-6 LunaModernLoop alternatives: Ashby's native scheduling, GoodTime
Muse Glimmer 30BModernLoop alternatives: Grayscale, Prelude

GoodTime first, ModernLoop an alternative

3 of 14 modelsModernLoop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniGoodTime alternatives: Ashby, Calendly, Greenhouse, Lever
Perplexity SonarGoodTime alternatives: Ashby, Cal.com, Lever, ModernLoop
Mistral SmallGoodTime alternatives: Calendly, ModernLoop, Paradox

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GoodTime leads by two points.
GoodTime2%#7 of 16
ModernLoop0%#14 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: ModernLoop leads at mid-market.
ModernLoop28%#1 of 15
GoodTime12%#3 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: GoodTime leads at enterprise.
GoodTime55%#1 of 13
ModernLoop9%#3 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ModernLoop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid these for budgets: Tools like GoodTime, Ashby, Paradox, or ModernLoop” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“recruiting-specific schedulers like GoodTime and ModernLoop are quote-only and usually mid-market to enterprise territory” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“instead of high-cost enterprise schedulers like GoodTime or ModernLoop” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with a demo of ModernLoop. It offers the best balance of features, pricing flexibility, and mid-market focus.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose ModernLoop for structured hiring, interviewer utilization and technical recruiting workflows.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“ModernLoop offers the best balance of ATS integration depth, panel coordination, and automation” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about GoodTime

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid - Enterprise-focused tools like GoodTime, VidCruiter, or Paradox” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid these for budgets: Tools like GoodTime, Ashby, Paradox, or ModernLoop” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid GoodTime (unless you're enterprise and test heavily)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you already have an ATS (like Greenhouse/Lever): Add GoodTime. It saves hiring managers significantly more time than Calendly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GoodTime for most mid-market B2B teams that take hiring seriously and want a scalable recruiting workflow.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Highly rated for mid-market and enterprise use, especially for structured, multi-stage hiring processes” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
ModernLoop vs CalendlyModernLoop vs KoalendarModernLoop vs Cal.comModernLoop vs LeverModernLoop vs GreenhouseModernLoop vs PreludeCalendly vs GoodTimeGoodTime vs KoalendarGoodTime vs Cal.comGoodTime vs LeverGoodTime vs GreenhouseGoodTime vs PreludeAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full interview scheduling standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.