Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Applicant tracking syste › Breezy HR vs Manatal
Applicant tracking systems · November 2026 Edition

Breezy HR vs Manatal

Two of fourteen models named Breezy HR first on the direct prompt; zero named Manatal. Breezy HR was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Manatal by ten and Breezy HR carries 30 labels and Manatal 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Breezy HR

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

Manatal

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share14%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels3014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Breezy HR reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Greenhouse was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Greenhouse vs Breezy HR · Greenhouse vs Manatal · Workable vs Breezy HR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Breezy HRFirst choices, of fourteen modelsManatal
Direct20
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained62
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Manatal
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Breezy HR and Manatal were named in the same answer 103 times, of the 243 answers naming Breezy HR and the 314 naming Manatal. In those answers Manatal took the first choice thirty-three times and Breezy HR twenty.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Breezy HR and Manatal stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Breezy HR Manatal first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Breezy HR on the left and Manatal on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Breezy HR and Manatal stood in it.

Breezy HR first, Manatal not the choice

2 of 14 modelsManatal was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXBreezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, Crelate
MiniMax M2.5Breezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: BambooHR, Greenhouse, Jobvite, Lever, Workable
GPT-5.4 miniGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, Workable
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint
Perplexity SonarGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, Workable
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Workable
Mistral SmallWorkable alternatives: Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho Recruit
DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashAshby, Greenhouse alternatives: Lever, SmartRecruiters
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever
GPT-6 LunaAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Muse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Lever, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Breezy HR leads by twenty-seven points.
Breezy HR32%#1 of 14
Manatal5%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Breezy HR leads by eleven points.
Breezy HR14%#3 of 17
Manatal4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Breezy HR0%#– of 10
Manatal0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Breezy HR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“If you hire only 1 role at a time and want to spend $0: Go with Breezy HR (for ease of use) or Zoho Recruit.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Breezy HR stands out as the best applicant tracking system (ATS) for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Breezy HR's free plan or Indeed's free candidate management to test your hiring flow.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Manatal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“May feel cumbersome for managing large candidate pools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best applicant tracking system for a company with a limited budget is Manatal, which is available at $15 per user a month” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.